2015
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2015.2478005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Mitigation of Transmitter-Induced Receiver Desensitization in Carrier Aggregation FDD Transceivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This signal passes the low-noise amplifier (LNA), which is assumed to be linear for the purposes of this work [16], [19]. The next stage is the (non-ideal) down-conversion with the main LO signal and optionally a harmonic with gain g sp…”
Section: A Interference Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This signal passes the low-noise amplifier (LNA), which is assumed to be linear for the purposes of this work [16], [19]. The next stage is the (non-ideal) down-conversion with the main LO signal and optionally a harmonic with gain g sp…”
Section: A Interference Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most concepts are based on polynomial PA models with and without memory. The estimation of the nonlinearity coefficients and the leakage path is implemented either using classical estimation approaches, such as batch least-squares solutions and the recursive least squares (RLS) [16], [17], or adaptive learning methods, like least-mean squares (LMS) algorithms combined with basis function orthogonalization [18], spline adaptive filters [19] and neural networks [20]. For many of these concepts, the computational complexity during training is high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the UE side, these approaches are referred to as the maximum power reduction (MPR) and maximum sensitivity degradation (MSD), respectively. However, these approaches impact negatively the UL link budget and throughputs [9] and are thus not the most appealing solutions. Alternatively, one could argue to utilize higher quality RF components with good linearity characteristics, however, this may considerably raise the overall radio implementation costs and size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recently demonstrated that in the context of LTE-Advanced mobile transmitter with noncontiguous CA or multicluster type transmission, the PA nonlinearities lead to spurious emissions that can seriously violate the given spectrum and spurious emission limits if not properly controlled [2], [4]- [6]. Furthermore, in FDD devices, in addition to violating the general spurious emission limits, the generated spurious components can also overlap with the device's own receive band, causing own receiver desensitization [4], [9], [11], [12]. One obvious solution to decrease the levels of unwanted emissions is to back off the transmit power from arXiv:1607.02249v2 [cs.IT] 19 Aug 2016 its saturation region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%