Digital natives, better learners? Students’ beliefs about how the Internet influenced their ability to learn

Kolikant, Yifat Ben‐David

doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.012

Cited by 110 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…En muchos países desarrollados, la mayoría de los adolescentes hacen uso intensivo de la tecnología digital, especialmente de Internet (Ben-David Kolikant, 2010Kolikant, : 1384. La mayoría de estos estudiantes, quienes nacieron aproximadamente entre 1980 y 1994 , representan las primeras generaciones que crecieron con esta nueva tecnología y se han caracterizado por su familiaridad y confianza con respecto a las TIC.…”

Section: Estudiantes Digitales Y No Nativos Digitalesunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Hablemos de estudiantes digitales y no de nativos digitales

Gallardo-Echenique

2013

UTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenEn el presente artículo, se analiza el contexto de la discusión sobre los "nativos digitales" y su competencia digital. De la revisión literaria, dos conclusiones se pueden extraer. En primer lugar, no hay una definición absoluta de los nativos digitales que puede variar entre los individuos, sociedades, regiones y naciones, y también a través del tiempo. En segundo lugar, hay un número de otras variables que la edad para predecir la naturaleza del uso de las tecnologías digitales en los estudiantes. En base a los resultados, la revisión literaria sobre los nativos digitales demuestra que a pesar de estar familiarizados con el uso de las tecnologías digitales y que sus habilidades digitales son altas, la competencia digital -la capacidad de evaluar y aprender desde los recursos -puede ser menor que la de sus profesores. Palabras claves: alfabetización digital, competencia digital, nativos digitales, era digital Let's talk about digital learners and not about digital natives AbstractThis article analyzed the context of discussion about "digital natives" and their digital competence. Two findings can be drawn from this review. First, there is no absolute definition of digital native: it will vary amongst individuals, societies, regions and nations, and also over time. Second, there are a number of variables other than age that may predict the nature of students' use digital technologies. On the basis of the findings, the analysis of the digital native literature demonstrates that despite their digital confidence and digital skills are high, their digital competence -the ability to assess and learn from resources -may be much lower than those of their digitally teachers.

show abstract

Section: Estudiantes Digitales Y No Nativos Digitalesunclassified

“…En la literatura, se asume que los estudiantes a veces se sienten facultados con respecto al aprendizaje debido a su familiaridad y al acceso a las TIC (Ben-David Kolikant, 2010Kolikant, : 1384.…”

Section: Dos Visiones Confrontadas De Un Mismo Conceptounclassified

Hablemos de estudiantes digitales y no de nativos digitales

Gallardo-Echenique

2013

UTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is a body of research questioning the validity of the generational interpretation of the 'Digital Native' concept and Table 1 elucidates the proliferation of less widely used monikers, each attempting to capture the essence of the same phenomenon (e.g., Bennett, Maton, & Kervin, 2008;Brown & Czerniewicz, 2010;Coombes, 2009a;Helsper & Eynon, 2010;Jones, 2011;Jones, Ramanau, Cross, & Healing, 2010;Jones & Shao, 2011;Kennedy, Judd, Churchward, Gray, & Krause, 2008;Kolikant, 2010).…”

Section: Generations Of Studentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Native or Novice?

Velliaris

Breen

2016

Handbook of Research on Engaging Digital Natives in Higher Education Settings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Access to and use of technology by students deemed to be ‘Digital Natives' studying in the Higher Education (HE) sector has been an area of much interest, speculation and publication. This chapter reports on a small-scale exploratory study that aimed to uncover the digital technology access and practices in both everyday life and academic study of ‘new' international first-year ‘pathway' students at the Eynesbury Institute of Business and Technology (EIBT). The purpose of this study was to contribute to the debate on digital natives by providing a ‘piece of evidence' on the access to and use of digital technologies by a group of pre-university pathway students. This exploratory study stemmed from the realisation that EIBT lecturers could better meet the needs of the current generation and cohort of 20+ ethnically diverse students, and help them acculturate and transition as lifelong learners who are able to adapt to an evolving information landscape in Australian HE and upon their return home.

show abstract

“…Educational environments constitute an important part of students' lives. Digital natives claim that schools should be organized in line with their own desires and needs (Kolikant, 2010). In this respect, it is thought that educational environments which are not designed for digital natives are likely to disengage students from the school, from the class and even from learning and that a conflict may occur between digital natives and the school (Pedró, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing Student Engagement and the Role of Technology in Student Engagement in Higher Education: Campus-Class-Technology Theory

Günüç¹,

Kuzu²

2014

TOJQI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the present study was to determine both the factors influencing student engagement and the role and influence of technology on student engagement. The study is important as it aimed at determining the views of students about student engagement and examining in detail the research data to be collected with two different data collection techniques. The present study was designed as a grounded theory study. The research sample included a total of 45 student teachers. Of all the participants, 25 of them participated in face-to-face Interviews, and 20 of them were asked to take part in written compositions. In conclusion, it was seen that the components constituting and influencing student engagement were found to be campus engagement and class engagement. It was found out that for most of the participating students, use of technology in class was not an indispensable factor for student engagement. In addition, an effective technology integration would not only contribute much to student engagement but also constitute an important way of increasing student engagement. Finally, it was seen that use of technology in instructional activities constituted an important factor for student engagement, when the findings obtained via the interviews and the written compositions were taken into consideration together. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, October 2014, 5(4) 87 olarak belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, öğrenci bağlılığını etkileyen faktörler, kampüse ve derse bağlılık bileşenleri altında ele alınmıştır. Ayrıca, birçok öğrenci için derste teknoloji kullanımı bağlılıklarının artması için şart görülmemiştir. Ancak etkili teknoloji entegrasyonunun, sadece öğrenci bağlılığına katkı sağlamadığı ayrıca öğrenci bağlılığını artırmanın önemli yollarından biri de olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Tüm bulgular sonucunda, öğrenci bağlılığı ve teknoloji kullanımı arasındaki ilişkiler çalışma sonucunda geliştirilen Kampüs-Ders-Teknoloji Kuramı ile açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır. Keywords

show abstract

Digital natives, better learners? Students’ beliefs about how the Internet influenced their ability to learn

Cited by 110 publications

References 20 publications

Hablemos de estudiantes digitales y no de nativos digitales

Hablemos de estudiantes digitales y no de nativos digitales

Native or Novice?

Factors Influencing Student Engagement and the Role of Technology in Student Engagement in Higher Education: Campus-Class-Technology Theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About