Digital Synchronous Collaboration Workspace and 3D Interactions for an AEC Project. Decision-Making Scenario Evaluation

Bolshakova, Veronika; Halin, Gilles; Humbert, Pascal; Boton, Conrad

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66805-5_21

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We define a SCS as the setting in which project stakeholders meet around a digital table, represented by a multi-touch collaborative device [5], with their digital documents that are brought in dynamically, according to meeting scope and needs. Experiments conducted in the past based on this setting [6], revealed several requirements in terms of: 1) user-centric interface features and 2) relevant project data. The heterogeneous project data varies from 3D geometry (IFC, laser scans, etc.…”

Section: Synchronous Collaboration Using Natural User Interfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ontology Assisted Collaboration Sessions on 4D BIM

Boje

Bolshakova²,

Guerriero

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stakeholders use 4D modelling during construction to coordinate project data and collaborate effectively. The collaborative sessions between project stakeholders have a complex dynamic. This research was conducted under the scope of the 4DCollab project, which aims to improve 4D BIM supported Synchronous Collaboration Sessions (SCS) by adopting a user-centric approach, whilst considering specific 4D use-case information requirements. Following several experimental SCS, an initial ontology model was developed. This model offers a holistic view of the dynamics between the following main concepts: the meeting itself (session), its participants (users), the 4D BIM model and the collaboration devices used for decision-making. Several existing schemas within the BIM domain were identified and considered for the definition of the proposed ontology, re-using several already validated concepts. The 4DCollab ontology is introduced following a rigorous design methodology. Its applications, limitations and future work are also outlined and discussed.

show abstract

Section: Synchronous Collaboration Using Natural User Interfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ontology Assisted Collaboration Sessions on 4D BIM

Boje

Bolshakova²,

Guerriero

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The experiment scenario required AEC professionals to collaborate and to resolve some design development and value engineering tasks with the assistance of 3D models, and it summarizes the limits of present collaboration solutions and the users demand for more natural and AEC customized interactions [7]. As the next stage, this paper summarizes collaboration groups and also personae study and 4D BIM uses, Decision-making tools limits evaluation…”

Section: D Collab Project Research Stagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collective Decision-Making with 4D BIM: Collaboration Group Persona Study

Bolshakova¹,

Guerriero²,

Carvalho³

et al. 2018

Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

4D BIM assures more detailed costs and error control, whilst also improving scheduling and coordination. It relies on interoperability and high levels of collaboration, which have increased the value of collective competencies. In addition to the competencies, the collaboration group internal influences and subordination must be considered as well. While the knowledge and competencies of each and every individual team member are important, BIM allows the team to use the entire set of collective knowledge, skills and competencies, which are the key feature for advanced digital management of the AEC project. Such management requires a successful implementation and efficient use of 4D or nD BIM. This study proposes to summarize collaboration personae of AEC project collaborative groups, and to associate the collective knowledge and competencies to 4D BIM uses. Further, it will be completed with interviews on current 4D practices with BIM professionals. Moreover, through this research, we continue to progress towards a new 4D collective decision-making support proposition.

show abstract