Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Scoping Review

Abstract

Background Digital technologies have the potential to contribute to health promotion and disease prevention in the aging world. Objective This study aims to identify digital technologies for health promotion and disease prevention that could be used independently by older people in nonclinical settings using a scoping review. Methods Through database (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS; to March 3, 2022) and manual searches (to June 14, 2022), 90 primary studies and 8 systematic reviews were included in this scoping review. The eligibility was based on the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) criteria: (1) people aged 50 years or older (population), (2) any digital (health) technology (eg, smartphone apps, websites, virtual reality; concept), and (3) health promotion and disease prevention in daily life in nonclinical and noninstitutional settings (context). Data items included study characteristics, PCC criteria, opportunities versus challenges, and evidence gaps. Data were synthesized using descriptive statistics or narratively described by identifying common themes. Results The studies were published in 2005-2022 and originated predominantly from North America and Europe. Most primary studies were nonrandomized, reported quantitative data, and investigated effectiveness or feasibility (eg, acceptance or usability) of digital technologies in older people. The participants were aged 50 years to 99 years, predominantly female, affluent (ie, with high income, education, and digital competence), and intended to use or used digital technologies for a median of 3 months independently at home or in community settings. The digital technologies included mobile or nonmobile technologies or virtual reality. The studies used “modern devices” (eg, smartphones, wearables, or gaming consoles) or modern and “older devices” (eg, computers or mobile phones). The users interacted with digital technologies via websites, emails, text messages, apps, or virtual reality. Health targets of digital technologies were mobility, mental health, nutrition, or cognition. The opportunities versus challenges of digital technologies were (1) potential health benefits versus unclear or no benefits for some outcomes, (2) monitoring of health versus ethical issues with data collection and management, (3) implications for functioning in daily life (ie, potential to prolong independent living) versus unclear application for clinical management or care, (4) tailoring of technical properties and content toward older users versus general use, (5) importance of human support for feasibility versus other factors required to improve feasibility, (6) reduction of social isolation versus access to digital technologies, and (7) improvement in digital competence versus digital divide. Conclusions Various digital technologies were independently used by people aged 50 years or older for health promotion and disease prevention. Future studies should focus on (1) more diverse populations of older people, (2) new digital technologies, (3) other (clinical and care) settings, and (4) outcome evaluation to identify factors that could enhance any health benefits of digital technologies. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/37729

Online dissemination of Cochrane reviews on digital health technologies: a cross-sectional study

“…Furthermore, different age cohorts may have distinct needs, preferences, and responses to digital health technologies due to their digital experience. While younger age cohorts are likely to be digitised (and thus considered as ‘digital natives’), older age cohorts have varying levels of digital experience that could affect their uptake and use of digital health technologies [ 43 , 44 ]. Thus, a future research priority is to assess the needs of diverse populations regarding digital health technologies.…”

Análisis de retos y dilemas que deberá afrontar la bioética del siglo xxi, en la era de la salud digital

“…Herramientas como La meva salut [Mi salud] 14 han establecido una conexión entre profesionales y pacientes. Sin embargo, plantea desafíos éticos, como el acceso limitado para personas que no cuentan con estas App o con escasa alfabetización digital 15 . A pesar de acercar la atención médica a regiones remotas, facilitando la comunicación y ofreciendo una atención inicial en lugares con limitada cobertura asistencial, impera garantizar la continuidad y la calidad asistencial.…”

Socio-economic inequalities in the breadth of internet use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults in England

“…Recent internet use among older adults in the UK aged 65 to 74 years has risen from approximately 52% to 83% between 2011 and 2019; of all adults aged 75 years and over, 20% were recent internet users in 2011, compared with 47% in 2019 [ 2 ]. Internet technology has the potential to enhance healthy ageing [ 3 ], social connectedness [ 4 ], and cognitive functioning [ 5 ]. However, older adults succumb to an age-related digital divide [ 6 , 7 ].…”