Digital Technology and Media Use by Adolescents: Latent Class Analysis

Abstract

Background Digital technology and media use is integral to adolescents’ lives and has been associated with both positive and negative health consequences. Previous studies have largely focused on understanding technology behaviors and outcomes within adolescent populations, which can promote assumptions about adolescent technology use as homogeneous. Furthermore, many studies on adolescent technology use have focused on risks and negative outcomes. To better understand adolescent digital technology use, we need new approaches that can assess distinct profiles within study populations and take a balanced approach to understanding the risks and benefits of digital technology use. Objective The purpose of this study was to identify profiles of adolescent technology use within a large study population focusing on four evidence-based constructs: technology ownership and use, parental involvement, health outcomes, and well-being indicators. Methods Adolescent-parent dyads were recruited for a cross-sectional web-based survey using the Qualtrics (Qualtrics International, Inc) platform and panels. Technology use measures included ownership of devices, social media use frequency, and the Adolescents’ Digital Technology Interactions and Importance scale. Parent involvement measures included household media rules, technology-related parenting practices, parent social media use frequency, and the parent-child relationship. Health outcome measures included physical activity, sleep, problematic internet use, and mental health assessments. Well-being indicators included mental wellness, communication, and empathy. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify distinct profile groups across the aforementioned 4 critical constructs. Results Among the 3981 adolescent-parent dyads recruited, adolescent participants had a mean age of 15.0 (SD 1.43) years; a total of 46.3% (1842/3981) were female, 67.8% (2701/3981) were White, and 75% (2986/3981) lived in a household with an income above the poverty line. The LCA identified 2 discrete classes. Class 1 was made up of 62.8% (2501/3981) of the participants. Class 1 participants were more likely than Class 2 participants to report family-owned devices, have lower technology importance scores, have household technology rules often centered on content, have positive parent relationships and lower parent social media use, and report better health outcomes and well-being indicators. Conclusions Findings from this national cross-sectional survey using LCA led to 2 distinct profile groups of adolescent media use and their association with technology use and parent involvement as well as health and well-being outcomes. The two classes included a larger Class 1 (Family-Engaged Adolescents) and a smaller Class 2 (At-Risk Adolescents). The findings of this study can inform interventions to reinforce positive technology use and family support.

A influência das mídias e redes sociais na saúde mental dos jovens

“…Este estudo foi responsável por analisar a influência do uso problemático da internet por esses jovens, foi descoberto que a fobia social gerada pelo diagnostico prévio deles contribui para o vício nos dispositivos. Dessa maneira, o uso prejudicial da internet influencia no crescimento da ansiedade dos participantes analisados (DEMIRTAS et al, 2021) O artigo publicado por Moreno et al, (2022), analisou perfis dos usuários de internet por adolescentes em uma grande população de estudo como foco em quatros construtos baseados em evidências: propriedade e uso de tecnologia, envolvimento dos pais, indicadores de saúde e bem-estar. Nesse contexto, foi descoberto que a falta de um ambiente familiar saudável e a negligência dos pais é um fator que influencia diretamente na probabilidade de adoecimento mental perante o uso excessivo das mídias sociais.…”

Time Spent on Mobile Apps Matters: A Latent Class Analysis of Patterns of Smartphone Use among Adolescents

“…In order to determine the number of classes, multiple indexes were used (i.e., the Bayesian information criterion, the sample size adjusted BIC, the entropy, the Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test, the bootstrap likelihood ratio test, the smallest class size, and the clinical meaning of the empirically derived homogeneous groups). The most meaningful and parsimonious model had the following indices: lower BIC and ssaBIC; larger entropy (more specifically, entropy may range from 0 to 1 and values ≥0.80 reflect higher classification accuracy [68]), smallest class size >5%; and significant LMR and BLRT [69].…”

#fitspiration: a comparison of the sport-related social media usage and its impact on body image in young adults

“…Author details 1 Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany. 2 Institut für Kreislaufforschung und Sportmedizin, Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Cologne, Germany.…”

“…Nowadays, almost all young people use social media [ 1 ]. Known as Digital Natives , they grew up with the internet and social media [ 2 ].…”

“…Classification of participants' body imagescan only be classified as normal, abnormal or extreme. Most participants could be classified in the normal group (0) of RBI (n = 125, 43.9%) and VBD (n = 153, 53.7%), and a balanced number of both scales (RBI: n = 64, 22.5%; VBD: n = 62, 21.6%) were in the abnormal group(1). Notably, with n = 41 (14.4%) more than twice as much participants were classified in the extreme group (2) of the RBI scale than the VBD scale (n = 15, 5.3%).…”