2018
DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital vs traditional: Are diagnostic accuracy rates similar for glass slides vs whole slide images in a non‐gynaecological external quality assurance setting?

Abstract: Diagnostic accuracy, using WSI for cases in our external quality assurance programme is acceptable. As the use of digital microscopy in a large scale external quality assurance programme offers extensive advantages over a glass slide-based format, our results encourage future comparison of diagnostic accuracy for virtual compared to glass slide format at a point in time where pathologists are becoming increasingly familiar with virtual microscopy in everyday practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, anatomic pathology and cytopathology quality assurance programmes have already adopted it to ensure safe diagnostic expertise. 20 , 21 Thus, the continuum of undergraduate–postgraduate learning of VM is now an established need. Continuing efforts and validation have brought VM into the realm of diagnostic histopathology with some centres having taken the leap to exclusive digital practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, anatomic pathology and cytopathology quality assurance programmes have already adopted it to ensure safe diagnostic expertise. 20 , 21 Thus, the continuum of undergraduate–postgraduate learning of VM is now an established need. Continuing efforts and validation have brought VM into the realm of diagnostic histopathology with some centres having taken the leap to exclusive digital practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of current z-plane stacking methods. [3031323334] The diagnostic accuracy of stacking 20 z-plane levels was equivalent to glass slide microscopy as evaluated by 24 experienced cytologists. [32] Another impact evaluation found no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the quality assessment of a digital slide generated from stacking three to five z-plane levels and a glass slide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,23,24 Other than proficiency testing, the standardised, fully accessible slide can be the base for quality control programmes. Indeed, as stated by Ross et al 52 , some specimen types do not lend themselves in sufficient volume to permit enough slides to be prepared, and the same applies to some diagnostic entities, so these are underrepresented in quality assurance programmes. WSI allows scanning of these fastidious cases once and for all, increasing the variety of the programme, and eliminates the issue that slides have to be prepared again and checked, thus reducing efforts to ensure standardisation of diagnostic material.…”
Section: Area Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WSI allows scanning of these fastidious cases once and for all, increasing the variety of the programme, and eliminates the issue that slides have to be prepared again and checked, thus reducing efforts to ensure standardisation of diagnostic material. 52 Finally, most of software for image analysis has started to accept WSI. Traditional image analysis on cytological specimens with segmentation of objects and extraction of measurement data 53 can be enhanced with WSI.…”
Section: Area Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%