Digital Workforce for the “Green” Economy “Smart” Enterprises: Training and Management Features

Tamakhina, A. Ya.; Mezhov, Stepan I.; Yungblyudt, Sergey V.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47945-9_39

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, DTs are inherently different from each other and most of the digitalization costs are due to the “inability to actually screen and select the available technologies that may sustain such transition” (Ardito et al, 2018, p. 324). Accordingly, digitalizing firms require diverse experts that firms do not often have (e.g., Tamakhina et al, 2020). This leads to a higher degree of uncertainty about the applicability of multiple DTs for their operations and, in turn, about their potential environmental and/or social benefits.…”

Section: Rqs Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of firm digitalization on sustainable innovation performance and the moderating role of corporate sustainability practices: An empirical investigation

Ardito

2023

Bus Strat Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper seeks to shed light on the relationship between firm digitalization and the likelihood of launching sustainable innovations (social and environmental, social only, and environmental only), for which the extant research has provided a paucity of evidence. In detail, the role of digitalization is considered in terms of (i) the specific effect of a given digital technology (DT)—among artificial intelligence, cloud computing, robotics, smart devices, big data analytics, high speed infrastructure, and blockchain—and (ii) the effect of the concurrent adoption of multiple DTs (degree of digitalization). Furthermore, the paper assesses if and how the effect of the degree of digitalization is moderated by the implementation of sustainability practices, as the two issues are often treated independently. Research questions are proposed instead of hypotheses. Econometric analysis to answer proposed questions is based on a sample of 14,125 firms, whose information is gathered from the survey Flash Eurobarometer 486. Results reveal that each DT differently affects the likelihood of launching sustainable innovations, while the degree of digitalization is always beneficial. Moreover, it appears that firm digitalization and the adoption of sustainability practices are not complementary. All in all, this paper helps to illuminate current representations of the interplay between digitalization, sustainability practices, and sustainable innovations at the firm level, with implications for research, managerial practice, and policymaking.

show abstract

Section: Rqs Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of firm digitalization on sustainable innovation performance and the moderating role of corporate sustainability practices: An empirical investigation

Ardito

2023

Bus Strat Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Digital Economy as an Independent Phase of the Macroeconomic Cycle Modern Transformation

Butorina

Shishkina

2021

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital Workforce for the “Green” Economy “Smart” Enterprises: Training and Management Features

Cited by 2 publications

References 20 publications

The influence of firm digitalization on sustainable innovation performance and the moderating role of corporate sustainability practices: An empirical investigation

The influence of firm digitalization on sustainable innovation performance and the moderating role of corporate sustainability practices: An empirical investigation

Digital Economy as an Independent Phase of the Macroeconomic Cycle Modern Transformation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About