2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-007-0103-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimension stone for building façades: methodology for structural design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the structural system, the stone-cladding façade was checked with respect to the horizontal forces of the wind according to the Norm SIA 261:2003 [57]. Seismic loads were not considered because the probability of the system being submitted to both forces simultaneously is negligible and because wind loads are usually much greater than seismic loads and govern most aspects of the design [58,59]. The thickness of the self-supporting stone wall (system B) was assumed to be 120e150 mm (SIA 260 [60], SIA 266/ 2:2012 [61]), whereas for system A, the thickness could take any value between 10 and 120 mm.…”
Section: Lca Of the Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the structural system, the stone-cladding façade was checked with respect to the horizontal forces of the wind according to the Norm SIA 261:2003 [57]. Seismic loads were not considered because the probability of the system being submitted to both forces simultaneously is negligible and because wind loads are usually much greater than seismic loads and govern most aspects of the design [58,59]. The thickness of the self-supporting stone wall (system B) was assumed to be 120e150 mm (SIA 260 [60], SIA 266/ 2:2012 [61]), whereas for system A, the thickness could take any value between 10 and 120 mm.…”
Section: Lca Of the Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be emphasised that, for some cladding systems, there is relevant information about design methods or approaches (Camposinhos and Camposinhos, 2009;Lammert and Hoigard, 2007;Moreiras et al, 2007;West, 2004), which exceed the traditional 'bending at midspan' stress calculations, often referred to as allowable stress design.…”
Section: Design Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…반면 광물자원의 탐 사는 오늘날의 탐사자들에게는 필수적이 된 지질학적, 지화학적, 지구물리적 방법들을 이용한 정밀 과학의 일부가 되어 있다. 그러나 광상과 마찬가지로 석재자 원의 부존 역시 한정된 지질학적 조건에 의해 좌우되 며 이러한 조건들을 판별함으로서 체계적인 방법으로 석재의 유망지를 발견할 수 있을 것이다 (Taboada et al, 1997;Taboada et al, 1998;Taboada et al, 1999;Taboada et al, 2002;Loorents et al, 2000;Selonen et al, 2000;Tercan and Özçelik, 2000;Sousa, 2007;Ribeiro et al, 2007;Moreiras et al, 2008). ( Kim et al, 1998)의 남서부 그리고 1 대 50,000 거창도폭 (Kim and Kim, 1970)의 중앙부에 넓게 분 포한다.…”
Section: 홍세선·이춘오·이진영·김유성unclassified