Dimensions of trust in different forms of science communication: the role of information sources and channels used to acquire science knowledge

Abstract

This paper investigates the dimensions of trust and the role of information sources and channels in developing differentiated forms of science communication. The discussions from two public consultations carried out in Italy and Slovakia about controversial science-related topics were quali-quantitatively content analysed. The results show that scientific knowledge pervades diverse communication spheres, producing differentiated paths of trust in science. Each path is determined by topics (environment or health-related), information sources and channels preferred, and specific features of the multifaceted notion of trust. The contribution discusses cross-national commonalities and specificities and proposes implications for science communication.

Differentiated Trust Strategies and Rebellious Acceptance: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the Trust Strategies Used by Scientist Communicators and Citizen Science Communicators in Chinese Online Climate Communication

“…Scientists tend to construct identity boundaries with the audience in science communication; while citizen science communication tends to dissolve such boundaries with the audience. This result works in concert with the findings from many previous studies (such as Besley & Tiffany, 2023;Brondi et al, 2021;McLoughlin, 2021;Yang, 2021Yang, , 2022b. The different biases between the two groups of communicators in rational and emotional trust strategies echo Fiske and Dupree's (2014) discovery that trust in science communication is not just about logic and knowledge, but also about emotions and values, which can be summarized as "warmth" and "competence."…”

Research on The living Intelligent Communication of Chinese Traditional Handmade Paper

“…The communication source of a message is the initiator and controller of the entire communication process (Brondi et al, 2021). It determines the content and quantity of messages entering the message channel.…”

Conocimiento y actitudes de la ciudadanía española sobre el big data y la inteligencia artificial

“…Junto a estas preocupaciones, existe una falta de comprensión pública hacia las tecnologías que aún son nuevas y están en constante cambio, conectando con nuestra vida diaria, trabajo, formación, finanzas y ocio. Y es que la comunicación de la ciencia de datos, y particularmente del big data y la inteligencia artificial, se lleva a cabo en un contexto en que los medios no son los únicos grupos encargados de transmitir información sobre la ciencia, ya que quienes producen estas ciencias pueden comunicarse directamente con la sociedad a través de canales digitales, y en el que las nuevas voces y canales han hecho que sea más necesario garantizar la calidad de los procesos de comunicación (Brondi et al, 2021;Taddicken & Krämer, 2021) Así, se empieza a desarrollar un campo de estudio que es transversal en ciencias sociales e informática (Cao, 2017;Samoili et al, 2020). Un ejemplo de ello es el trabajo de Lytras & Visvizi (2019), que define un impacto social de los grandes datos, revisado a través de tres factores: la intención de compartir datos personales, las preocupaciones individuales y el impacto social.…”