1973
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2220590229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dipolar contributions to magnetic hyperfine fields in ErxY1−xFe2 and TbxY1−xFe2 compounds

Abstract: Mossbauer effect measurements on 67Fe have been carried out in the pseudobinary systems Er,Y1 -,Fez and Tb,YI +Fez at 4.2, 80, and 300 K. The isotropic part of the hyperfine field acting on the iron nuclei includes a term due to polarization by the localized rareearth spin. Magnetic dipolar contributions account only in part for the differences in the magnitude of the hyperfine fields at the inequivalent sites.Des mesures d'effet Mossbauer sup le 57Fe ont ht6 effectuhes dans les systbmes pseudobinaires Er,Y1 -… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it was assumed that all subspectra originated by the random distribution of Fe and Co atoms can be ascribed to the [1 1 1] direction of the easy seen that for Tb 0.27 Dy 0.73 (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 ) 2 with k = 6 cobalt atoms as nearest neighbours there is no magnetic hyperfine interaction at the studied iron nuclei and only the quadrupole doublet is observed. The problem of fitting this kind of complex Mössbauer spectra is described elsewhere [29,[31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Spectra and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it was assumed that all subspectra originated by the random distribution of Fe and Co atoms can be ascribed to the [1 1 1] direction of the easy seen that for Tb 0.27 Dy 0.73 (Fe 0.1 Co 0.9 ) 2 with k = 6 cobalt atoms as nearest neighbours there is no magnetic hyperfine interaction at the studied iron nuclei and only the quadrupole doublet is observed. The problem of fitting this kind of complex Mössbauer spectra is described elsewhere [29,[31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Spectra and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless the distinctions remain larger than those obtained from dipole field calculations. A similar explanation to that given for (Y, Er)Fe2 and (Y, Tb)Fe, seems not to be possible [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…On the other hand, for a defined site H(i'S) can be assumed to be constant. From the surrounding atoms a dipole field, determining partly H t ) , results [17] and can be calculated from…”
Section: ( H F ) ) and An Anisotropic Part (Hf)) [17]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the fitting procedure, it was assumed that the starting amplitudes A(n 2 ) and thus the weights of subspectra: W(n 2 ) = A(n 2 )/ΣA(n k ) follow the probabilities P(n 2 ). Sometimes it is important to consider also the direction of the [1 1 1] easy axis of magnetization during the fitting procedure, which introduces additional complexity of spectra [26][27][28][29]. After a number of different fitting trials, the simpler case, the [1 0 0] easy axis of magnetization was assumed to exist for all the subspectra [26].…”
Section: Spectra and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%