Dire et ne pas dire

Petit, François-Xavier

doi:10.3917/hyp.121.0191

Cited by 26 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Negation research, based on the works by Jespersen (1917), Klima (1964) and more recently Horn (1989), has led to several typologies that classify negation according to its syntax or pragmatic meaning (Dahl, 1979;Payne, 1985, Nølke, 2017. From a pragmatic approach (Ducrot, 1972;Nølke, 2017), negations can be interpreted as inhabiting a continuum from describing the state of the world (descriptive) to opposing a former assertion, which is not always explicit (polemic), including form-based responses to a speaker (metalinguistic). Descriptive negations emphasise their descriptive value -this being the reason for the negation, transforming negative content into a new assertion that could not, in the speaker's mind, be expressed in a more accurate manner, although this does not suggest that interlocutor believes the underlying positive proposition:…”

Section: Negationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(1a) There is no cloud in the sky (Ducrot, 1972, p.38, cited in Nølke, 2017 has the affirmative meaning of: (1b) The sky is blue (Nølke, 2017, p.151) Although, in this case, the statement 'The sky is blue' or 'The sky is clear' might describe a perceived reality more accurately and simply.…”

Section: Negationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We observed a negating gesture co-occurring with the first negative particle not: In this example, the gesture is synchronous with the negative particle (often observed with negating gestures (Harrison, 2018)). It is a pragmatic gesture with a metadiscursive function, stressing a polemic negation, the marker itself, where unintended potential content from a previous utterance is denied (Ducrot, 1972;Nølke, 2017). The teacher makes implicit reference to previous content-the war-and actualises it.…”

Section: T1 -Example (1)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Meaning of Teachers’ Negations in Hong Kong Classrooms Interpreted from their Co-occurring Gestures

Lopez-Ozieblo¹

2023

Negatives and Meaning: Social Setting and Pragmatic Effects. Using Negatives in Political Discourse, Social Media and Oral Inte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Negationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Negationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: T1 -Example (1)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Meaning of Teachers’ Negations in Hong Kong Classrooms Interpreted from their Co-occurring Gestures

Lopez-Ozieblo¹

2023

Negatives and Meaning: Social Setting and Pragmatic Effects. Using Negatives in Political Discourse, Social Media and Oral Inte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Contrairement à l'anglais, en français, les recherches sont principalement axées sur les questions liées aux présuppositions et implicatures, comme en témoignent les travaux de chercheurs tels que p. ex. Ducrot (1972Ducrot ( , 1977, Anscombre et Ducrot (1983), Zuber (1972), Kleiber (2012), Fasciolo (2012), Biglari et Bonhomme (2018).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Inférences au pays de la prosodie

Banyś

2023

NEO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When it comes to language, it’s not just the grammatical structure and the literal meaning of words that matter. The way a predicate imposes inferences on its propositional arguments is crucial to understanding the true meaning of a message. However, these inferences are influenced by many factors, such as prosody, world knowledge, speakers’ expectations regarding language use, situational stereotypes, and other implicit or contextual elements.In this paper, we examine the inferential status of the verbs referred to by Karttunen as “implicative verbs”. On the one hand, two-way implicative verbs, and on the other, one-way implicative verbs. The latter have been little studied from this perspective. This will lead us to highlight the fundamental role, too often forgotten, of prosody and focus/theme in this type of analysis and in determining the inferential status of predicates. Our analyses show that, once prosody has been considered, the classification of theoretically possible verb inferences accepted until now needs to be modified. We do not have 4 groups of one-way implicative verbs, as has been argued, but 2, namely the groups: [+/+/– // –/–] [affirmed > true or false // denied > false] of the type être capable, pouvoir and [+/+/– // –/+] [affirmed > true or false // denied > true] of the type hésiter à.The remaining two groups, considered as distinct and autonomous one-way implicative verbs with the suggested characteristics: [+ + // – +/–] [affirmed > true // denied > true or false] of the type forcer to and [+ – // – +/–] [affirmed > false // denied > true or false] of the type refuser de, belong to the canonical groups of two-way implicative verbs, respectively: forcer à to the group of verbs of the type réussir à: [+/+ // –/–] [affirmed > true // denied > false] and refuser de to the group of verbs of the type oublier de: [+/– // –/+] affirmed > false // denied > true].Naturally, this classification differentiation, important as it is, only reflects the different behaviour of certain types of predicate, and this is the most important element of these analyses with a view to automating the recognition of predicate inferences.

show abstract

“…Quanto à implicitude, além de ser um traço indispensável da língua -cuja primeira função é econômica por natureza -também desempenha um papel importante na comunicação persuasiva (VALLUARI; MASIA, 2014). Pelo menos desde Frege (1892, p. 40), explicam Valluari e Masia (2014), ficou claro para os estudiosos que tratam da língua e do texto (embora o fato já estivesse claro para os profissionais da retórica por milênios) que a mensagem implícita pode facilitar a persuasão da audiência (DUCROT, 1972;GRICE, 1975;STRAWSON, 1964).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

A relação metonímia-metáfora e a persuasão implícita em memes multimodais / The metonym-metaphor relationship and the implicit persuasion in multimodal memes

Ikeda¹,

Silva²,

Saparas³

2020

Rev. Est. Ling.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo: O objetivo deste artigo é o exame crítico da persuasão implícita e sua ocorrência em memes multimodais que circulam pelo Facebook, tendo como foco a relação entre metonímia e metáfora. A persuasão tende a ser altamente implícita e a evitar a linguagem atitudinal normalmente associada ao significado interpessoal, dependendo em grande parte do frame, ou seja, do sistema de valores compartilhados. Esse é o fenômeno que caracteriza a metonímia, um tropo que, sendo indicial, informa somente parte da mensagem, dependendo do receptor para a complementação da informação. Nesse sentido, tem sido aceito que as metáforas conceituais podem ser casos especiais da interação conceitual com a metonímia, a qual propicia a contiguidade entre o texto e o frame do leitor. Com base nessa relação, o meme, apesar de sua diminuta Palavras-chave: meme multimodal; persuasão implícita; metonímia; metáfora;

show abstract

Dire et ne pas dire

Cited by 26 publications

References 0 publications

The Meaning of Teachers’ Negations in Hong Kong Classrooms Interpreted from their Co-occurring Gestures

The Meaning of Teachers’ Negations in Hong Kong Classrooms Interpreted from their Co-occurring Gestures

Inférences au pays de la prosodie

A relação metonímia-metáfora e a persuasão implícita em memes multimodais / The metonym-metaphor relationship and the implicit persuasion in multimodal memes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About