2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2011.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct dynamics studies for the reactions of CF3CHFCF3 and CF3CF2CHF2 with H atoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that although most of the computed quantities listed in Table 1, obtained using the MPW1K functional with the two different basis sets (6‐31+G** in the present work and 6‐311+G** from Ref. [47]), are very similar, the computed TS imaginary vibrational frequencies differ by 88i cm −1 , suggesting that basis set effects on the shape of the computed MEPs near the TS are not insignificant. In addition, computed CVT/SCT k values obtained with the G3(MP2)//MPW1K/6‐311+G** dual level MEP from reference [47] agree very well with available experimental k values from Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that although most of the computed quantities listed in Table 1, obtained using the MPW1K functional with the two different basis sets (6‐31+G** in the present work and 6‐311+G** from Ref. [47]), are very similar, the computed TS imaginary vibrational frequencies differ by 88i cm −1 , suggesting that basis set effects on the shape of the computed MEPs near the TS are not insignificant. In addition, computed CVT/SCT k values obtained with the G3(MP2)//MPW1K/6‐311+G** dual level MEP from reference [47] agree very well with available experimental k values from Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…[47]), are very similar, the computed TS imaginary vibrational frequencies differ by 88i cm −1 , suggesting that basis set effects on the shape of the computed MEPs near the TS are not insignificant. In addition, computed CVT/SCT k values obtained with the G3(MP2)//MPW1K/6‐311+G** dual level MEP from reference [47] agree very well with available experimental k values from Ref. [2] (fitted to an Arrhenius expression; see Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model 2 should be recommended for fitting since it gives very small fitting errors for the reactions studied in this work and other references. [50,51] To illustrate the discrepancy caused by fitted models, we plot the rate constants k 1 and k 2 fitted by the model 1 and model 2 in Figures 7a and 7b, respectively. Model 2 clearly provides a better low-temperature asymptotic behavior, which is very important to generate accurate rate constants at any temperature within the range that is used in the fitting and to extrapolate the rate constants beyond the temperature range that used in the fitting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%