2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14962-7_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directed Deadline Obligations in Agent-Based Business Contracts

Abstract: Abstract. There are B2B relationships that presume cooperation in contract enactment. This issue should be taken into account when modeling, for computational handling, contractual commitments through obligations. Deadline obligations have been modeled by considering that reaching the deadline without compliance brings up a violation. When modeling commitments in business contracts, directed obligations have been studied for identifying two agents: the obligation's bearer and the counterparty, who may claim fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Related to our abstraction of temporal norms Lopes Cardoso and Oliveira propose reasoning and monitoring for norms with flexible deadlines [59,60]. In their proposal, the idea is that deadlines in contractual norms are not always strict, but instead one party can violate a deadline (e.g., to deliver goods) whilst the counter-party may be okay to waive the violation if the obligation is discharged within a reasonable time after its violation (e.g., if the goods being delivered are more important than the sanction for the misdemeanour).…”
Section: Abstracting Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to our abstraction of temporal norms Lopes Cardoso and Oliveira propose reasoning and monitoring for norms with flexible deadlines [59,60]. In their proposal, the idea is that deadlines in contractual norms are not always strict, but instead one party can violate a deadline (e.g., to deliver goods) whilst the counter-party may be okay to waive the violation if the obligation is discharged within a reasonable time after its violation (e.g., if the goods being delivered are more important than the sanction for the misdemeanour).…”
Section: Abstracting Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il est de plus une conséquence logique de notre deuxième exigence, suivant laquelle uneéchéance doitêtre située dans le futur. L'alternative qui consisteraità maintenir l'obligation après l'échéance, eventuellement jusqu'à ce qu'elle soit respectée, relèverait de la concession d'une extension au délai initial, comme cela a puêtre discuté par d'autres auteurs [11]. Si nous n'excluons pas la possibilité de demander que l'obligation soit de nouveau considérée avec une nouvellé echéance, nous préférons considérer séparément le premieréchec.…”
Section: Normes Datéesunclassified
“…Par ailleurs, DLP ne permet pas d'utiliser la notion de liveline (à opposerà deadline, pouŕ echéance) utilisée par Henrique Lopes Cardoso et Eugenio Oliveira [11]. Si uneéchéance est la date avant laquelle l'obligation doitêtre remplie, la liveline est la date après laquelle elle doit etre remplie : une obligation remplie trop tôt peut alorsêtre considérée comme une violation.…”
Section: Limitations Formellesunclassified
“…The concept of norm instance lifecycle has been treated by di erent authors, e.g. [Abrahams and Bacon 2002;Cardoso and Oliveira 2010;Fornara and Colombetti 2009;Oren et al 2009], but with no real consensus. Taking those interesting elements that would allow the management of norms with the concepts of activation, maintenance, ful lment and reparation, a suitable norm lifecycle would be similar to the one based on the automaton depicted in Figure 6.4.…”
Section: Dealing With Norm Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%