2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Director gender and mergers and acquisitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

53
439
5
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 587 publications
(505 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
53
439
5
8
Order By: Relevance
“…10, No. 5;2015 227 2013; Levi et al, 2014). Tong (2003) has identified in testing of situational theory in China that there is no impact of women domestic burdens on their political culture and participation in politics, which we too argue with reference to keeping in mind the top women executive in power.…”
Section: Political Issue and Gender Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…10, No. 5;2015 227 2013; Levi et al, 2014). Tong (2003) has identified in testing of situational theory in China that there is no impact of women domestic burdens on their political culture and participation in politics, which we too argue with reference to keeping in mind the top women executive in power.…”
Section: Political Issue and Gender Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, recent studies provide support for the idea that having women on corporate boards increases organizations' sustainability. Companies with more women tend to be more effective in dealing with acquisitions and mergers, as well as less prone to risky transactions (Levi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Good Practice Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Levi, Li, and Zhang (2014), we generate our probability scores through yearly logit regressions. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Levi et al (2014), we generate our probability scores through a yearly logit regression. Our dependent variable is a binary variable indicating the presence of female directors on the board, and the explanatory variables are firm size, return on assets, and leverage.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation