2015
DOI: 10.5902/2179769213002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direitos legais da pessoa com câncer: conhecimentos de usuários de um serviço de oncologia público

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We verified that FCGs who used collective transport had worse QoL in general health and in the psychological domain, similar to other reports on patients with HNC in PC (Sciubba, 2016), and breast and cervical cancers (Coughlin & King, 2010; Sciubba, 2016). About 32% of the Brazilian population uses public transportation (Silveira & Cocco, 2013), and by law, cancer patients have a free pass for municipal and inter‐municipal public and medical transportation (da Rosa, 2014). In addition, concerns about cognitive function impairment, distress related to cancer, and neck mobility limitations influence the driving skills of patients with HNC; therefore, the FCGs also take on the responsibility of transportation (Yuen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We verified that FCGs who used collective transport had worse QoL in general health and in the psychological domain, similar to other reports on patients with HNC in PC (Sciubba, 2016), and breast and cervical cancers (Coughlin & King, 2010; Sciubba, 2016). About 32% of the Brazilian population uses public transportation (Silveira & Cocco, 2013), and by law, cancer patients have a free pass for municipal and inter‐municipal public and medical transportation (da Rosa, 2014). In addition, concerns about cognitive function impairment, distress related to cancer, and neck mobility limitations influence the driving skills of patients with HNC; therefore, the FCGs also take on the responsibility of transportation (Yuen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%