The Handbook of Discourse Analysis 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118584194.ch41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourse in the Workplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the research aims to investigate the use of an inclusive language and the best way to foster equality and diversity, a ground discourse analysis of the Corpus has been deemed as fundamental to understand the different aspects of the language use and the discourse itself (Gee, 2011 All the above-mentioned elements make this research unique, both from a linguistic point of view than from a sociological one. This study relies on similar research, in fact, different studies have been conducted in the past about workplace discourse (Alvesson & Karreman, 2000;Grant & Iedema, 2004;Rodríguez, 2006;Cotter & Marschall, 2006;Bréda, Delattre, & Ocler, 2008;Koester, 2010;Tatli, 2011;Kärreman, 2014;Holmes, 2015;Manuti & Minnini, 2015;Mayr, 2015). All of them have contributed to set the ground of this research, and in particular of the chapter related to the discourse analysis of the EU HRM Legal Corpus, although none of these studies particularly focused on the language used in the EU Institutional context or on the contextual value setting of equality and diversity.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As the research aims to investigate the use of an inclusive language and the best way to foster equality and diversity, a ground discourse analysis of the Corpus has been deemed as fundamental to understand the different aspects of the language use and the discourse itself (Gee, 2011 All the above-mentioned elements make this research unique, both from a linguistic point of view than from a sociological one. This study relies on similar research, in fact, different studies have been conducted in the past about workplace discourse (Alvesson & Karreman, 2000;Grant & Iedema, 2004;Rodríguez, 2006;Cotter & Marschall, 2006;Bréda, Delattre, & Ocler, 2008;Koester, 2010;Tatli, 2011;Kärreman, 2014;Holmes, 2015;Manuti & Minnini, 2015;Mayr, 2015). All of them have contributed to set the ground of this research, and in particular of the chapter related to the discourse analysis of the EU HRM Legal Corpus, although none of these studies particularly focused on the language used in the EU Institutional context or on the contextual value setting of equality and diversity.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important element of this study is the issue of the EU Civil Servants' identity building. To support the corpus analysis in such field different studies have been taken into consideration, in particular, those related to the development of participants' identities in a multilingual and multicultural setting (Edwards, 2009;Cenoz, 2013;Holmes, 2015;Searle, 2015).…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations