Discrete mesoscale analysis of adhesive anchors under tensile load taking into account post-installed reinforcement

Siamakani, Seyed Yaser Mousavi; Jiradilok, Punyawut; Nagai, Kohei; Sahamitmongkol, Raktipong

doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120778

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Karam et al [8] used the model with Voronoi mesh to minimize bias on IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1195/1/012016 2 concrete cracks pattern. Mousavi et al [9] reported the pull-out capacity of post-installed anchors in concrete. Wang et al [10] confirmed that concrete exposed to freeze-thaw cycles increased in static strength but conversely in fatigue performance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of various parameters in sensitivity analysis of plain concrete beam using rigid body spring model

Purnomo

Lie

Gan

et al. 2023

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Rigid Body Spring Model (RBSM) is an alternative method to Finite Element Model (FEM) to solve continuum problems in civil engineering. The method has three main advantages, i.e., having a smaller local stiffness matrix, the ability to directly simulate cracks, and independent formulation of element types. Although the method has been extensively used in studying the behaviour of concrete structures, specific research on sensitivity analysis of this method has not been done nor published. In this research, sensitivity analysis of plain concrete beam using the model is performed. The parameters to be considered are boundary size, boundary element type, number of elements, crack mesh refinement, number of stages, and the effect of half modelling. Based on the sensitivity analysis, optimum parameters were selected to calibrate the model to three plain concrete samples. The result suggests that modulus elasticity of cylindrical concrete under compressive test is to be reduced around 0.2 times for simulating beam under third point loading.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%