2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2016.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminant analysis is an inappropriate method of authentication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
75
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we can repeat our notion presented in Rodionova et al “The “best” classification method does not exist. Every task at hand requires an application of a pertinent chemometric method best suited to answer the posed question.”…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, we can repeat our notion presented in Rodionova et al “The “best” classification method does not exist. Every task at hand requires an application of a pertinent chemometric method best suited to answer the posed question.”…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In our paper, we criticized the PLS‐DA method for wrong interpretation of new objects. The main drawback of this approach is its inability of proper classification of the samples, which do not belong to any of the predefined classes.…”
Section: Soft Pls‐damentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, QDA outperformed LDA using the same pretreatments and number of features. This is likely due to large differences between class-covariance matrices, but further investigation would be necessary to exclude overoptimistic results due to sampling inadequacies and thus biased detection models (Oliveri and Downey, 2012;Rodionova et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discriminant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%