2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminating between background and mine-impacted groundwater at the Phoenix mine, Nevada USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, based on the above analysis, the concept of box graph [31] is introduced to find the abnormal values of various ions in water; the box graph can calculate the upper edge, the upper quartile Q3, the median, the lower quartile Q1 and the lower edge, and all apart from the upper and lower edges of a group of data are abnormal values, as shown in Figure 3, which is the box graph of anions and cations. By comparing the background values of India [32][33][34], the United States [35,36], Iran [37,38] and Xilinhot City [39,40] near the study area, it can be found that the concentration of Na + at the measuring point CQ22 is abnormally large, with the concentration value of 501. By comparing the background values of India [32][33][34], the United States [35,36], Iran [37,38] and Xilinhot City [39,40] near the study area, it can be found that the concentration of Na + at the measuring point CQ22 is abnormally large, with the concentration value of 501.…”
Section: Chemical Correlation Analysis Of Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, based on the above analysis, the concept of box graph [31] is introduced to find the abnormal values of various ions in water; the box graph can calculate the upper edge, the upper quartile Q3, the median, the lower quartile Q1 and the lower edge, and all apart from the upper and lower edges of a group of data are abnormal values, as shown in Figure 3, which is the box graph of anions and cations. By comparing the background values of India [32][33][34], the United States [35,36], Iran [37,38] and Xilinhot City [39,40] near the study area, it can be found that the concentration of Na + at the measuring point CQ22 is abnormally large, with the concentration value of 501. By comparing the background values of India [32][33][34], the United States [35,36], Iran [37,38] and Xilinhot City [39,40] near the study area, it can be found that the concentration of Na + at the measuring point CQ22 is abnormally large, with the concentration value of 501.…”
Section: Chemical Correlation Analysis Of Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing the background values of India [32][33][34], the United States [35,36], Iran [37,38] and Xilinhot City [39,40] near the study area, it can be found that the concentration of Na + at the measuring point CQ22 is abnormally large, with the concentration value of 501. By comparing the background values of India [32][33][34], the United States [35,36], Iran [37,38] and Xilinhot City [39,40] near the study area, it can be found that the concentration of Na + at the measuring point CQ22 is abnormally large, with the concentration value of 501. For the above individual limit values, we can consider that they are caused by accidental factors, but the two measuring points CQ20 and CQ22 show limit values on multiple ion concentrations.…”
Section: Chemical Correlation Analysis Of Groundwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations