Discussion and Directions for Future Research

Jansen, Sylvia J.T.; Coolen, Henny; Goetgeluk, Roland

doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8894-9_11

Cited by 18 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The strong preference for a semi-detached dwelling in the city centre seems rather optimistic, just like the strong preference for a garden, even in a sample with aboveaverage income. One has to keep in mind that stated preference research, like the study presented in the current paper, concerns temporary wants and ideals that can be internally inconsistent and that cannot always be realized in the actual housing market (Myers and Gearin 2001;Jansen, Coolen, and Goetgeluk 2011;Luckey et al 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urban, suburban or rural? Understanding preferences for the residential environment

Jansen

2020

Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are two ongoing trends that lead to changing preferences for the built environment. One concerns a demographic transition into more but smaller, and older, households. The other concerns greater possibilities to satisfy residential preferences due to rising incomes and technological advances. The current study explores the preference for the type of residential environment and the underlying motivations. The smaller municipality is most preferred (36%), followed by the city edge (32%), a rural area (13%), the city centre (11%) and no preference (7%). The city centre is preferred because of amenities, ambiance, liveliness and activities. The city edge is preferred because of peace and quiet and easy access to the dwelling. Social contact was rarely mentioned. In contrast, respondents who preferred a smaller municipality frequently mentioned social contact. Furthermore, feeling safe/secure and wellbeing were important items. Finally, respondents with a rural preference mentioned freedom and peace and quiet.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urban, suburban or rural? Understanding preferences for the residential environment

Jansen

2020

Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Purchase intention can predict purchase behavior (Ajzen, 2008). Generally, a house purchase is triggered by the transition in a person's life cycle, and the mismatch of the current house with the current need (Jansen et al, 2011). During the pandemic, the need for an additional room or a particular workspace increases as a result of the work-from-home system (WFH).…”

Section: Housing Attributes Preferences and Risk Preferencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These activities or tasks can be completed using technology in flexible workspaces, especially at home, which is known as telecommuting or telework (Vyas and Butakhieo, 2021). These events trigger changes in the needs or lifestyle (Jansen et al, 2011) in housing products. House purchase intention is the possibility of a plan or willingness of consumers to buy a house (Wu et al, 2011) that is influenced by physical attributes, neighborhood preferences, financial concerns (Chia et al, 2016;Hoxha and Zeqiraj, 2020) and risk preferences (Letkiewicz and Heckman, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

House purchase intention during pandemic COVID-19 in Surabaya, Indonesia

Anastasia

Sugeng²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeSince the COVID-19 occurred, large-scale social restriction (Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar-PSBB) has taken place, and that has led family members to carry out their activities at home. This condition impacts both directly and indirectly the intention of house purchase, as a result of lifestyle changes during the pandemic. A house now serves as a residence, office, as well as school. This study aims to determine the influences of physical attributes, neighborhood preferences, financial concerns, financial risk preferences, health risk preferences, and COVID anxiety towards house purchase intention.Design/methodology/approachThis associative study was carried out from February to May 2021 in the residents of Surabaya aged 20–34 years old as prospective first-home buyers, with relatives at risk of contracting COVID-19 (belong in the susceptible group or live with a family member who is prone to the COVID-19 virus, including having a comorbidity, elderly (= 60 years old), having a low immune system or autoimmune disease, obese). Data were gathered using online questionnaires from which 226 respondents were acquired. Data were analyzed using the PLS-SEM 3.0 technique.FindingsThe results showed that physical attributes, neighborhood preferences, financial concerns, financial risk preferences, and COVID anxiety significantly influence house purchase intention. Furthermore, neighborhood preferences, financial risk preferences, and COVID anxiety as moderating variables also significantly influence house purchase intention.Practical implicationsThis study was carried out in Surabaya as the second-largest city after Jakarta with the highest COVID-19 mortality rate, which is useful for exploring the lifestyle changes and property demand as a result of the pandemic; Developers gain a business opportunity by offering properties that are multifunction and health-oriented.Originality/valueThe COVID-19 pandemic becomes a trigger for a change in the property market that needs to be studied further.

show abstract

“…Berkaitan dengan bobot pada penilaian, konsep pemberian bobot untuk pengambilan keputusan (dalam kasus ini adalah kelulusan peserta) dapat mengikuti kaidah Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) karena pengambilan keputusan tersebut diambil berdasarkan multikriteria (Jansen, 2011). Konsep dari perhitungan ini yaitu bahwa sebuah keputusan kuantitatif (u(x)) terdiri dari beberapa kriteria (ui) yang akan dibobotkan oleh bobot kriteria (wi) (lihat Persamaan 1).…”

Section: Studi Literaturunclassified

Mengevaluasi Proses Penilaian Pada Training di Himpunan Mahasiswa Islam dengan Kerangka Sistemik

Maulana

2022

AFEKSI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Proses pelatihan di Himpunan Mahasiswa Islam (HMI) merupakan proses penting sebagai organisasi kader. Kualitas seluruh kegiatan organisasi tergantung pada kualitas kader dan kualitas pelatihannya (proses kaderisasi). Organisasi ini menetapkan dua jenis pelatihan yaitu pelatihan formal dan pelatihan informal. Untuk meningkatkan kualitasnya, kader harus dilatih dalam pelatihan formal yaitu Latihan Kader-I, Latihan Kader-II, dan Latihan Kader-III. Pelatihan ini menjadi tanggung jawab pengurus bidang pembinaan anggota dan Badan Pengelola Latihan (BPL). Namun, kedua pengurus tersebut tidak memiliki indikator pasti untuk dapat digunakan oleh instruktur dalam menentukan kualitas kader dalam pelatihannya secara kuantitatif. Dalam praktiknya, instruktur selalu menggunakan sistem penilaian baru yang akan berdampak pada ketidaksetaraan standar penilaian pelatihan secara umum. Studi ini akan mengevaluasi proses penilaian pelatihan di HMI menggunakan kerangka sistemik yaitu Soft System Methodology. Kerangka kerja ini akan menjelaskan bagaimana penilaian pelatihan dilakukan, kondisi ideal penilaian pelatihan, kesenjangan pelaksanaan, dan rekomendasi untuk perbaikan. Dalam penyusunan kondisi ideal, formula terkait pelaksanaan teknis proses penilaian juga akan dilakukan sebagai salah satu rekomendasi untuk perbaikan bagi HMI.

show abstract

Discussion and Directions for Future Research

Cited by 18 publications

References 15 publications

Urban, suburban or rural? Understanding preferences for the residential environment

Urban, suburban or rural? Understanding preferences for the residential environment

House purchase intention during pandemic COVID-19 in Surabaya, Indonesia

Mengevaluasi Proses Penilaian Pada Training di Himpunan Mahasiswa Islam dengan Kerangka Sistemik

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About