2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-007-2623-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispersion of femtosecond laser pulses in beam pipelines from ambient pressure to 0.1 mbar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the authors' knowledge, most of these values have not been reported previously. The second-and third-order dispersion values of air, measured in [16][17][18][19], are in good agreement with our values (from ref. [16] 20.14 ± 0.14 fs 2 /m and 18 ± 15 fs 3 /m, respectively).…”
Section: Gassupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To the authors' knowledge, most of these values have not been reported previously. The second-and third-order dispersion values of air, measured in [16][17][18][19], are in good agreement with our values (from ref. [16] 20.14 ± 0.14 fs 2 /m and 18 ± 15 fs 3 /m, respectively).…”
Section: Gassupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This could be important in those cases where fast detection and response is required, most notably, for CEP stabilization. Practically, the spacing of the spectral fringes, or more precisely their deviation from equidistance, is affected by the GDD of the multilayer mirrors [99], the ambient air of the interferometer [100] and beam splitters forming the cavity. Small residual GDD contributions can be removed from the phase extraction by suitable calibration as long as they are static.…”
Section: Multiple-beam Interferometer For Cep Drift Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the complementary spectral domain, this scenario gives rise to the appearance of spectral interference fringes. As each pulse in the produced train experiences an additional round trip in the MBI compared to its predecessor, the spacing of the spectral fringes, or more precisely their deviation from equidistance, is uniquely defined by the group delay dispersion of the multilayer mirrors forming the cavity [9], by the ambient air of the interferometer [10], and by other sources of intracavity dispersion. If all sources of intracavity dispersion are avoided, however, one can reverse the situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%