2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10755-022-09614-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disposition Towards Critical Thinking and Student Engagement in Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the SEM indicated that all proposed hypotheses, except for H4 and H13, were supported. In other words, learning engagement had a significant influence on computational thinking, which was consistent with the partial findings of Álvarez‐Huerta, Muela, and Larrea [1], and Zhang et al [55]. The researchers found that students who exhibited high levels of learning engagement demonstrated more creativity and were highly committed to reflective learning, which were all supportive factors for improving computational thinking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of the SEM indicated that all proposed hypotheses, except for H4 and H13, were supported. In other words, learning engagement had a significant influence on computational thinking, which was consistent with the partial findings of Álvarez‐Huerta, Muela, and Larrea [1], and Zhang et al [55]. The researchers found that students who exhibited high levels of learning engagement demonstrated more creativity and were highly committed to reflective learning, which were all supportive factors for improving computational thinking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The study found that the students' critical thinking skills were improved through various forms of research engagement. Álvarez‐Huerta, Muela, and Larrea [1] conducted an experimental study with college students to examine the relationship between critical thinking and engagement. The findings showed a positive and direct relationship between students' engagement and their critical thinking.…”
Section: Research Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results confirm the ambiguity of the results obtained in similar studies. While some studies report only few statistically significant changes in students' CT dispositions, including their decrease [53], other studies report an increase in CT dispositions [54] or even their significant improvement [55]. However, as different studies use different instruments to measure CT dispositions (e.g., the current study, [53][54][55]), the comparison of results may not be absolutely valid.…”
Section: What Students Learnedmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…While some studies report only few statistically significant changes in students' CT dispositions, including their decrease [53], other studies report an increase in CT dispositions [54] or even their significant improvement [55]. However, as different studies use different instruments to measure CT dispositions (e.g., the current study, [53][54][55]), the comparison of results may not be absolutely valid. Interestingly, the results on the "open-mindedness" scale confirm the earlier finding that CS students are significantly more ambivalent and less positive on this scale than humanities students [53].…”
Section: What Students Learnedmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…According to studies, some didactic strategies favor the development of critical thinking: the discussion of case reflection based on the Graham Gibbs cycle (Ardian et al, 2019), display of arguments (Ngajie et al, 2020), team-based learning (Silberman et al, 2020) and reflection in teaching (Xie et al, 2020;Fandiño Parra et al, 2021). It has been shown, speaking of its second dimension, that it is a factor that is directly and positively related to the participation and commitment of university students in academic activities (Álvarez-Huerta et al, 2023) and with learning styles (Behzadi and Momennasab, 2023). In addition, parenting style is related (Huang et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2020) and learning motivation (Oh et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%