2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissipations in reinforced concrete components: Static and dynamic experimental identification strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This comes from the reduced number of phenomena retained in the proposed constitutive modeling (essentially diffused damage) and from the regulatory requirement of low values for the RC structural damping even after the nonlinear incursions into damaged states. Indeed, as revealed during these experimental campaigns, it is possible to identify an increasing damping level with the evolving damaged state of the RC sections, see for instance (Heitz et al 2018). Nevertheless, it can be concluded on the relevance of structural nonlinear calculations in order to take profit of energy dissipation and internal forces redistribution, in terms of seismic safety margins best-estimate justification.…”
Section: Enhanced Kinematics Modelsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This comes from the reduced number of phenomena retained in the proposed constitutive modeling (essentially diffused damage) and from the regulatory requirement of low values for the RC structural damping even after the nonlinear incursions into damaged states. Indeed, as revealed during these experimental campaigns, it is possible to identify an increasing damping level with the evolving damaged state of the RC sections, see for instance (Heitz et al 2018). Nevertheless, it can be concluded on the relevance of structural nonlinear calculations in order to take profit of energy dissipation and internal forces redistribution, in terms of seismic safety margins best-estimate justification.…”
Section: Enhanced Kinematics Modelsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The Ph.D. study of T. Heitz (2017) allowed the performing of a huge experimental seismic campaign, and part of the data were studied and interpreted Dynamic experimental set-up on the Azalée shaking table Vol. 177, (2020) Main Achievements of the Multidisciplinary SINAPS@ Research Project (Heitz et al 2018). Nevertheless, the problematics of the damping in reinforced concrete structures during seismic events represent a vast field of challenges that has still to be tackled.…”
Section: Main Achievementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental campaign performed by [2] at the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) Saclay represents a huge amount of data that can be used as a reference to validate numerical analyses. Experiments were performed with different material properties, structural configurations and excitation characteristics on reinforced concrete beam.…”
Section: Reinforced Concrete Beam Under Earthquake Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a shake table experimental campaign performed by Heitz [2] to characterize seismic energy dissipation in reinforced concrete beams, a numerical study is presented herein. It aims at evaluating the performances of existing local as well as global (Rayleigh) damping formulations in representing the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the nonlinear time‐history analysis, which is based on the nonlinear constitutive model, is the most appropriate way to account for the hysteretic behaviors of structures 14 . Under this condition, the damping should account for the remaining energy dissipation which is not explicitly modeled, including the energy dissipated through cracking or internal friction between the constitutive material 15 . Considering the fact that the viscous damping mechanism is not derived from sound physical principles, the choice of the viscous damping model to cover this part of energy dissipation is quite questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%