1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01187116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociated neurons of the pupal honeybee brain in cell culture

Abstract: Primary cell cultures were prepared from specific regions of the pupal honeybee brain which are involved in proboscis extension learning. Defined areas could be dissociated purely by mechanical treatment. We show that cultured neurons regenerate new neurites and remain viable for up to three weeks in a serum-free, chemically-defined medium. Several labelling techniques were employed to identify subpopulations of cultured neurons. For example, acetylcholinesterase staining; fluorescent beads to distinguish iden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cultured projection neurons or Kenyon cells do not retain their in vivo morphology. This is probably not a consequence of the labelling procedure, because it has been described previously for cultures of unlabelled Kenyon cells (Kreissl and Bicker, 1992) and unidentified antennal lobe neurons (Devaud et al, 1994;Kirchhof and Mercer, 1997). Also, in the present study branching patterns of labelled and unlabelled neurons within a given culture dish were indistinguishable.…”
Section: Identification and Culturing Of Projection Neuronssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cultured projection neurons or Kenyon cells do not retain their in vivo morphology. This is probably not a consequence of the labelling procedure, because it has been described previously for cultures of unlabelled Kenyon cells (Kreissl and Bicker, 1992) and unidentified antennal lobe neurons (Devaud et al, 1994;Kirchhof and Mercer, 1997). Also, in the present study branching patterns of labelled and unlabelled neurons within a given culture dish were indistinguishable.…”
Section: Identification and Culturing Of Projection Neuronssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Kenyon cells and projection neurons were dissected and cultured following a modified protocol of Kreissl and Bicker (1992). After the staining procedure brains were removed from the head capsule and transferred into a preparation medium (Leibovitz L15, Gibco BRL; see below).…”
Section: Preparation Of Cell Cultures and Cell Identification In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of cultured Drosophila neurons of various stages from wild type and mutants allowed morphological and electrophysiological assessment, but without specific identification of the neurons beyond their regional origin (Salvaterra et al, 1987;Byerly and Leung, 1988;Solc and Aldrich, 1988;Wu, 1988;Li and Meinertzhagen, 1995;O'Dowd, 1995;Z hao and Wu, 1997). Primary cultures enriched for M B neurons have been established from brains of other insects (Kreissl and Bicker, 1992;Cayre et al, 1998), but the lack of tools for genetic manipulation limits the versatility of these systems. Acutely dissociated Drosophila M B neurons have been identified using M B-restricted lacZ reporter gene expression in combination with hypotonic loading of a fluorogenic substrate of ␤gal (Wright and Zhong, 1995;Delgado et al, 1998).…”
Section: The Kenyon Cell Culture Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protocols for the cultivation of honey bee neuronal cells were developed about twenty years ago (Gascuel et al, 1991;Kreissl and Bicker, 1992;Devaud et al, 1994;Gascuel et al, 1994;). The original purpose at that time was to complement in vivo studies on the insect olfactory system with data from in vitro cell culture experiments.…”
Section: Isolation and Cultivation Of Primary Neuronal Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%