2018
DOI: 10.1111/exsy.12352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance‐based multicriteria group decision‐making approach with probabilistic linguistic term sets

Abstract: Probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) are an important expression for hesitant linguistic preference information under group decision‐making circumstances. This study investigates problems of multicriteria group decision making (MCGDM) with PLTSs. A novel and rational comparison method is first proposed, and two distance measures for PLTSs are defined. The weight of each criterion is then obtained via maximum deviation method. Subsequently, extended Techniques for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, we will take the SVNWDBM and SVNWDGBM operator in other ways such as gene selection (Huang & Liang, ). In addition, we will also take Dombi BM into diverse fuzzy environment (Alcantud & Mathew, ; Hayat, Ali, Cao, Karaaslan, & Yang, ; Peng & Wang, ; Peng & Dai, a,b; Peng, Dai, & Garg, ; Peng & Garg, ; Peng & Liu, ; Peng & Selvachandran, ; Peng & Yang, , ; Peng, Yuan, & Yang, ; Wang, Wang, & Zhang, ; Zhan & Alcantud, ; Zhang, Park, & Wu, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, we will take the SVNWDBM and SVNWDGBM operator in other ways such as gene selection (Huang & Liang, ). In addition, we will also take Dombi BM into diverse fuzzy environment (Alcantud & Mathew, ; Hayat, Ali, Cao, Karaaslan, & Yang, ; Peng & Wang, ; Peng & Dai, a,b; Peng, Dai, & Garg, ; Peng & Garg, ; Peng & Liu, ; Peng & Selvachandran, ; Peng & Yang, , ; Peng, Yuan, & Yang, ; Wang, Wang, & Zhang, ; Zhan & Alcantud, ; Zhang, Park, & Wu, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the PLTS theoretical basis construction, many researchers discussed the aspects of relevant algorithms [1,2], distance and similarity measures [3,4], possibility degree measures [5,6], and information entropy measures [7]. Many scholars also extended some classic decision-making methods to PLTS situations, and explored their usefulness in decision making areas [1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Several scholars have successfully explored the application of the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) in the PLTS environment [1,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation information provided by DMs is inaccurate under a complex decision‐making environment. Thus, this information is provided in the form of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFS) (Garg & Kumar, ), Z numbers (Peng & Wang, ), probabilistic linguistic term sets (Luo, Zhang, Wang, & Li, ; Wang, Wang, & Zhang, ), and so on. Amongst them, the hesitant fuzzy set (HFS) has been applied to solve MCGDM problems (Xu & Zhou, ) because the HFS can contain more uncertain information than other fuzzy sets (Ding, Xu, & Zhao, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%