2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinctions in bone matrix nanostructure, composition, and formation between osteoblast-like cells, MG-63, and human mesenchymal stem cells, UE7T-13

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 86 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We postulate that on the sPCL/nHAp‐P‐ss(50) and sPCL/nHAp‐R‐ss(50) scaffolds, the concentration of calcium on the surface of the materials was too high for the cultivated cell line, which lowered the proliferation rate—a similar result and conclusion is presented by Priyam et al 52 We observed uniform red staining of the sPCL/nHAp‐P‐ss(50) and sPCL/nHAp‐R‐ss(50) scaffold surfaces, despite an apparent lack of cells (Figure 13B). In the sPCL/nHAp‐S‐ss(50) variant, ARS staining indicated the presence of additional bright red clusters of calcium deposits, produced by differentiated cell mineralization, 55,56 but the overall staining intensity was lower than in the case of sPCL/nHAp‐P‐ss(50) and sPCL/nHAp‐R‐ss(50) scaffolds, which confirms the lower availability of calcium on the sPCL/nHAp‐S‐ss(50) scaffold surface. No visible red coloration in the sPCL scaffold or bright red cellular calcium deposits were observed, which was caused by the absence of ceramic particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We postulate that on the sPCL/nHAp‐P‐ss(50) and sPCL/nHAp‐R‐ss(50) scaffolds, the concentration of calcium on the surface of the materials was too high for the cultivated cell line, which lowered the proliferation rate—a similar result and conclusion is presented by Priyam et al 52 We observed uniform red staining of the sPCL/nHAp‐P‐ss(50) and sPCL/nHAp‐R‐ss(50) scaffold surfaces, despite an apparent lack of cells (Figure 13B). In the sPCL/nHAp‐S‐ss(50) variant, ARS staining indicated the presence of additional bright red clusters of calcium deposits, produced by differentiated cell mineralization, 55,56 but the overall staining intensity was lower than in the case of sPCL/nHAp‐P‐ss(50) and sPCL/nHAp‐R‐ss(50) scaffolds, which confirms the lower availability of calcium on the sPCL/nHAp‐S‐ss(50) scaffold surface. No visible red coloration in the sPCL scaffold or bright red cellular calcium deposits were observed, which was caused by the absence of ceramic particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%