2016
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2015.2494844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Coordinated Motion Tracking of the Linear Switched Reluctance Machine-Based Group Control System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the zero phase-difference effect is taken at about the time of 11 s. From the dynamic error response profiles as Figure 8b, it is clear that the maximum error values fall into 0.5 mm at the steady state. Figure 8c is the steady-state position response profiles under the distributed PD control strategy [8]. It can be seen that the phase errors of the LSRMs network under the distributed PD control is greater than the phase-difference response from the proposed control strategy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear that the zero phase-difference effect is taken at about the time of 11 s. From the dynamic error response profiles as Figure 8b, it is clear that the maximum error values fall into 0.5 mm at the steady state. Figure 8c is the steady-state position response profiles under the distributed PD control strategy [8]. It can be seen that the phase errors of the LSRMs network under the distributed PD control is greater than the phase-difference response from the proposed control strategy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the method proposed in [8], system matrices A i and B i (i = 1, 2, 3) can be obtained by the online least squares identification [4] with a sampling time of T = 0.001 s, and they can be derived as:…”
Section: Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to linear PM synchronous machines, the LSRM is more cost-effective, owing to its robust and stable mechanical structure. Therefore, the overall system cost for the implementation of a coordinated linear motion control network is low [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to linear PM synchronous machines, the LSRM is more cost-effective, owing to its robust and stable mechanical structure. Therefore, the overall system cost for the implementation of a coordinated linear motion control network is low [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research mainly concentrates on optimized machine design and control performance improvement of single switched reluctance machine based motion control systems [13][14][15][16][17]. In [13], a double-sided, asymmetric LSRM structure is proposed to ensure a higher force-to-volume ratio with more acceleration, compared to a double-sided, symmetric counterpart with the same dimensions and ratings [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%