2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16108-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution-Dependent PAC-Bayes Priors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…√ n using Stirling's approximation of the factorial [19]. For the sake of simplicity we restrict ourselves to the slightly weaker bound (18), although all results that are based on Lemma 2 can be slightly improved by using the tighter bound.…”
Section: Appendix a Proofs Of The Results For Individual Martingalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…√ n using Stirling's approximation of the factorial [19]. For the sake of simplicity we restrict ourselves to the slightly weaker bound (18), although all results that are based on Lemma 2 can be slightly improved by using the tighter bound.…”
Section: Appendix a Proofs Of The Results For Individual Martingalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of PAC-Bayesian analysis with Hoeffding-Azuma's inequality was applied by Lever et. al [18] in the analysis of U-statistics. The results presented here are both tighter and more general, and make it possible to apply 1 The complete statement of Donsker-Varadhan's variational formula for relative entropy states that under appropriate conditions KL(ρ π) = sup φ φ, ρ − ln e φ , π , where the supremum is achieved by φ(h) = ln ρ(h) π(h) .…”
Section: − −−−−−−−− → Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we may need to fix an "informed prior" to minimise the KL divergence with an interesting posterior. This idea has been studied by [16,17] and, more recently, by Mhammedi et al [18], Rivasplata et al [5], among others. We will adapt it to our problem in the simplest way.…”
Section: Lemma 1 For Any Given Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, it has been widely applied to regression [7], density estimation [9], and analysis for non-Ll.D. data [10][11].…”
Section: Valiant Proposed the Probably Approximately Correct (Pac)mentioning
confidence: 95%