2018
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.10.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of the atypical pathogens of community-acquired pneumonia to disease severity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the GLIMP [19] and EPIC studies [20], viral CAP diagnosis was 37.2% in Asia and 23% in the USA, similar to our results (39.2%). Studies of adult CAP in China from 2001 and 2005 showed that bacterial aetiology (atypical and other bacteria) was much higher than viral causes (30.3-53.1% versus 10.6-19.0%) [21][22][23][24][25], whereas recent CAP aetiology studies from 2009 and 2016 in China revealed an increased detection of viral infections (21.1% versus 34.9%) and a decline of bacterial infections (7.8-24.8%) [14,[26][27][28][29], similar to the trends reported in European countries and the USA [30]. The use of new molecular diagnostic methods rather than paired serum antibody titres might explain the higher rate of viral detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the GLIMP [19] and EPIC studies [20], viral CAP diagnosis was 37.2% in Asia and 23% in the USA, similar to our results (39.2%). Studies of adult CAP in China from 2001 and 2005 showed that bacterial aetiology (atypical and other bacteria) was much higher than viral causes (30.3-53.1% versus 10.6-19.0%) [21][22][23][24][25], whereas recent CAP aetiology studies from 2009 and 2016 in China revealed an increased detection of viral infections (21.1% versus 34.9%) and a decline of bacterial infections (7.8-24.8%) [14,[26][27][28][29], similar to the trends reported in European countries and the USA [30]. The use of new molecular diagnostic methods rather than paired serum antibody titres might explain the higher rate of viral detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of new molecular diagnostic methods rather than paired serum antibody titres might explain the higher rate of viral detection. According to the recent epidemic surveillance data, with the exception of IFV, the primary causes of non-influenza viral pneumonia in China were AdV, RSV, CoVs, PIV, HRV and HMPV, with these viruses representing the main focus of this study [14,26,29,[31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAP patients were included if they had evidence of CAP according to the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adult community-acquired pneumonia in China (2016 edition) and the guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in children (the revised edition of 2013) [ 28–30 ]. They were further classified as severe CAP (SCAP) and non-severe CAP (NSCAP) based on illness severity according to the criteria described previously [ 31 ]. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study subjects were described in detail in appendix supplementary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several case‐control studies have reported a higher risk of developing severe or very severe CAP (SCAP) among patients infected with RSV 4,5 . However, similar results have not been observed among Chinese children in Beijing, 3 suggesting that sustained effort is needed to understand whether viral infections lead to more serious disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%