2014
DOI: 10.17663/jwr.2014.16.2.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution pattern according to altitude and habitat type of the Red-tongue viper snake (Gloydius ussuriensis) in the Cheon-ma mountain

Abstract: The distribution of animals is affected by habitat selection, and habitat type and prey resource are important factors affecting their survival. This study was conducted to investigate the distribution pattern of the Red-tongue viper snake (Gloydius ussuriensis) with respect to altitude, habitat type and distribution of potential prey resource in Cheon-ma mountain, Korea. The study area of Cheon-ma mountain was separated into three altitude categories (low, middle, and high altitude) and the habitat types were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The G. ussuriensis population in Korea utilize diverse food sources; their main food sources are amphibians and rodents, followed by fish, mammals, reptiles, and invertebrates. On the other hand, G. intermedius only feeds on rodents 26 , 34 , 45 . According to previous research that utilized wireless tracking devices to study the G. ussuriensis population in Korea, the mean travel distance of G. ussuriensis (39.64 ± 22.11 m), which moved for 1 month (September), was longer than that of G. saxatilis (21.50 ± 23.40 m), which moved for 2 months (August and September 46 , 47 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The G. ussuriensis population in Korea utilize diverse food sources; their main food sources are amphibians and rodents, followed by fish, mammals, reptiles, and invertebrates. On the other hand, G. intermedius only feeds on rodents 26 , 34 , 45 . According to previous research that utilized wireless tracking devices to study the G. ussuriensis population in Korea, the mean travel distance of G. ussuriensis (39.64 ± 22.11 m), which moved for 1 month (September), was longer than that of G. saxatilis (21.50 ± 23.40 m), which moved for 2 months (August and September 46 , 47 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the main food sources of G. ussuriensis , which are amphibians (inland: 23 species, Jeju: 7 species) and rodents (inland: 19 species, Jeju: 8 species), geographically differ in terms of species diversity. Since these animals are more diverse in inland regions than in Jeju-do, there are also differences in the preferred food sources between the inland and Jeju-do populations of G. ussuriensis 26 , 27 , 35 , 49 . In the G. ussuriensis population in Jeju-do, the males have evolved to be larger than the females due to intrasex competition, as a means of increasing the frequency of mating and occupying favorable breeding grounds; these species also tend to show a higher rate of male-to-male combat behavior 21 , 50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Korea, 8 snake species in Colubridae, 3 in Viperidae and 3 in Elapidae have been identified (Kang and Yoon 1975). Recently, multiple studies have investigated Korean snakes, through verifying a specific species in the Korean peninsula (Lee et al 2013); determining food, habitat use and home range (Kim et al 2012b, Lee et al 2012, Do and Yoo 2014, Kim and Oh 2014; and describing mating patterns, including courtship behaviors (Kim et al 2012a). Despite such progress, the basic morphological and anatomical characteristics of Korean snakes remain poorly reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Jeju Island, its distribution is homogenous (Figure 2) and it is one of the most commonly encountered snakes. In Jeju Island, it utilizes various habitats ranging from mountain forests to low altitude areas containing swamps and marshes [26,27]. They are frequented more open microhabitats that had rocks or fallen logs that served as a refuge or basking spots.…”
Section: Life History 31 Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%