2013
DOI: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.2069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributional chaos for strongly continuous semigroups of operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was incorporated to the setting of linear dynamics in [81,82], and thoroughly studied in [83]. The corresponding version for C 0 -semigroups was given in [84]. In this notion we require a scrambled set S such that the orbits of any couple of distinct points are closed enough or at least at some distance, measured in terms of upper densities.…”
Section: Distributional Chaosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was incorporated to the setting of linear dynamics in [81,82], and thoroughly studied in [83]. The corresponding version for C 0 -semigroups was given in [84]. In this notion we require a scrambled set S such that the orbits of any couple of distinct points are closed enough or at least at some distance, measured in terms of upper densities.…”
Section: Distributional Chaosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in [83] that the existence of distributionally irregular vectors was equivalent to distributional chaos for single operators, and later generalized for C 0 -semigroups in [84].…”
Section: Definition 110 ([84])mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will study the existence of distributional chaos for the solutions to this general model, and we will analyze, as a particular case, its consequences for the (IFBC) car-following model. In order to do this, we will use the following criterion which ensures distributional chaos and can be found in [4]. …”
Section: Chaos For the Forward And Backward Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for the case when a, b, d where real numbers, the same result holds just taking the restriction of W 0 to the real numbers. For further details we refer the reader to the proof of Criterion 3.2, see [4,12,36]. This approach can be compared with [24,Th.…”
Section: Lemma 33 (See Lemma 1 In [10])mentioning
confidence: 99%