Divergent we fall: The challenges for welfare state - Social integration and unemployment policies in the Visegrad Countries

Abstract

This article examines the unemployment policy of Central-East-European countries applying mixed methods. First, fuzzy set analysis is used to determine the efficiency of unemployment measures for reducing the poverty gap. Three causal conditions are measured: the net replacement rate of unemployment benefits, labour law regulations related to job security, and public spending on labour-market programs. This analysis reveals two possible pathways: governments may either provide a high level of job security, or spend on active and passive labour-market measures. Second, the fuzzy set analysis was completed with a comparative legal analysis covering the Visegrad countries that examined the policy choices the Visegrad countries made after the economic crisis. The paper argues that due to the different approaches to the welfare state, any potential EU initiatives for regulating unemployment benefits under the European Pillar of Social Rights might put divergent adaptation pressure on the V4 states. The differences are significant, as they would not only challenge effective social integration but also hamper the envisioned political cooperation of the V4 countries in this policy area. Building on previous literature, this paper is written to contribute to research on the European Social Model and social integration within the European Union.

New insights on immigration, fiscal policy and unemployment rate in EU countries – A quantile regression approach

“…The phenomenon of unemployment directly exerts an influence on individuals' capacity to acquire essential resources, exercise preferences in consumption, and uphold a specific standard of living. This implies that when individuals experience unemployment, there is a noteworthy effect on their capability to secure vital resources, make decisions regarding their consumption patterns, and sustain a particular quality of life [ 3 , 4 ]. Unemployment widens income inequality, hinders economic growth via wasted resources and reduced spending, links to poverty by denying basic needs, triggers migration for job prospects, and fuels economic instability.…”

Social spending and chronic unemployment: evidence from OECD countries

“…First, unemployed individuals may not meet their personal needs. According to the literature, unemployment directly affects individuals' access to resources, consumption preferences and living standards (Thorns, 1982; Carbone and Hey, 2004; Doling and Koskiabo, 1990; Eichorn, 2014; Michaillat and Saez, 2019; Hungler, 2022). In addition to the micro effects of unemployment, it brings along macro-scale problems such as income inequality, economic growth, poverty, migration and economic instability (Makaringe and Khobai, 2018; Antolin and Bover, 1997; Wiemers, 2014; Çelikay, 2017; Michaillat and Saez, 2019).…”