1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(84)90377-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divertor parameters and divertor operation in ASDEX

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
35
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of Separatrix location determined by the peak in plasma pressure (≈ n e T e ) is denoted by the vertical dashed line at −3cm. The T e profile is similar to that found in ASDEX [14] exhibiting a broad temperature "shoulder". electrons in the plasma divided by the nominal electrons supplied by the gas fueling rates is interpreted as a fueling efficiency.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The ratio of Separatrix location determined by the peak in plasma pressure (≈ n e T e ) is denoted by the vertical dashed line at −3cm. The T e profile is similar to that found in ASDEX [14] exhibiting a broad temperature "shoulder". electrons in the plasma divided by the nominal electrons supplied by the gas fueling rates is interpreted as a fueling efficiency.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In this section, we investigate the possibility to use the Langmuir probes to measure the temperature at the wall in detached conditions, which is generally considered to be a difficult regime for Langmuir probe measurement interpretation. [30][31][32] Indeed, it has been seen in several tokamaks, 33,34 including TCV, 31,32 that in detached conditions, the Langmuir probe analysis yields electron temperature higher than that one would expect from other diagnostics such as spectroscopy, [35][36][37] Thomson scattering, 29,38 or simulations. 31 Several mechanisms might be responsible for this effect, such as the role of plasma resistance 1,39 or the fluctuations of the floating potential.…”
Section: Application To Detached Plasmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption for Maxwellian EEDF in fusion plasma is generally accepted and used in most cases of evaluating the main plasma parameters. However, there appeared theoretical predictions [21][22][23] and experimental evidence [24][25][26][27][28][29] that the EEDF can deviate from the Maxwellian in the vicinity of the last closed flux surface (LCFS) and in the divertor region of the tokamaks. To the best of our knowledge, only the first-derivative probe technique (FDPT), presented and discussed in detail in the review paper [8], could estimate the real EEDF if it deviates from the Maxwellian.…”
Section: First-derivative Probe Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%