2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00186.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dividend Taxes and Implied Cost of Equity Capital

Abstract: We estimate firm-level implied cost of equity capital based on recent advances in accounting and finance research and examine the effect of dividend taxes on the cost of equity capital. We investigate whether dividend taxes affect firms' cost of capital by testing the relation between the implied cost of equity capital and a measure of the tax-penalized portion of dividend yield, which we define as the product of dividend yield and the dividend tax penalty. The results generally support the dividend tax capita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong explanatory power of the dividend yield in RIM2 confirms the findings of Dhaliwal et al (2005). The rather poor performance of the standard regression tests for expected returns raises the question what variables determine the implied risk premium calculated from the RIM approach.…”
Section: A) the Regression Setupsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strong explanatory power of the dividend yield in RIM2 confirms the findings of Dhaliwal et al (2005). The rather poor performance of the standard regression tests for expected returns raises the question what variables determine the implied risk premium calculated from the RIM approach.…”
Section: A) the Regression Setupsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…For a detailed study on taxation and implied cost of capital, see Dhaliwal et al (2005) 9 Although analysts usually forecast earnings beyond year 1, we had not any access to this data. Claus and Thomas (2001) use the same approach to generate missing data in their study.…”
Section: Data Description 1 Data For the Cost Of Capital Calculamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable t d is the maximum tax rate for individual shareholders on dividend income and t cg is the maximum tax rate for individual shareholders on recognition of capital gains. This is the same formula used to calculate the dividend tax penalty in Dhaliwal, Krull, Li and Moser (2004 institutional owners classified as mutual funds or investment advisors (brokers) and its probability of repurchasing stock as the dividend tax penalty increases.…”
Section: Tax Incentive Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Poterba and Summers (1985), Ayers, Cloyd, and Robinson (2002), and Auerbach and Hassett (2007) for evidence of e¤ects on …rm value. 49 In fact, the new view implies that reducing the dividend tax rate to a minimum conceivable rate could actually reduce investment because dividend tax rates could then only rise (Korinek and Stiglitz 2009). other …rms (Auerbach and Hassett 2002;Dhaliwal, Krull, Li, and Moser 2005), especially startups that may be particularly reliant on external equity …nancing. This paper's main analysis sample contains many start-ups, but most …rms are not young: the median …rm age studied here is 22 years, and only one of the one hundred most valuable publicly traded companies in the United States was founded since 2003.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%