2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.12.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DMSO inhibits human platelet activation through cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition. A novel agent for drug eluting stents?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) of 1% was chosen as the positive control. It presumably prevents platelet activation as an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-1 (17). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) of 1% was chosen as the positive control. It presumably prevents platelet activation as an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-1 (17). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the inhibitory effect of silybin on thrombin was significantly weaker than the effect of cyanidin and quercetin. Asmis et al (2010) suggest that 0.5 % DMSO inhibits platelet response to arachidonate, but aggregation in response to other agonists (ADP, collagen, ristocentin, epinephrine, U46619) was not affected by DMSO. We also checked the effect of 0.77 % DMSO on blood platelet activity and did not observe any changes in thrombin-induced aggregation between control and DMSO treatment platelets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of ADPinduced aggregation, SSE 150 (8.0 ± 2.77%, data not shown) and 200 g/ml showed similar effects with nitroprusside 30 g/ml (6.3 ± 0.96%). Because DMSO, which we used for dissolving SSE as stock solution (100 mg/ml), was reported to have anti-aggregating effects, especially via inhibiting thromboxane production (Saeed et al, 1988;Asmis et al, 2010), it needed to be investigated whether the DMSO vehicle could show the anti-aggregating effects. Thus, we compared the effect of DMSO 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.4% with PBStreated control and found that there were no differences between groups (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%