2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage in different wildlife species exposed to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) from the delta of the Coatzacoalcos river, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is suggested to consider evaluating oil spills in soils, the SARA fractions and the date of the spill. On the one hand, the results show that the type of solvent defines the amount of isolated analyte, which varies its solubility (González-Mille et al, 2019); and on the other hand, although the samples are located within the same study area, the differences between the SARA fractions and the FTIR show that the time and conditions of the spill could influence the transformation of the hydrocarbon (Xu et al, 2019;Xing et al, 2019). An example of the above is that according to the values in Table I, with TPHP the samples P631, P655, P659, P668, P685, P688 and P702 do not exceed the Maximum Permissible Limit (MLP) of TPH established for agricultural use in Mexico (4400 mg kg −1 ), whereas with TPHS values, only P655, P659, P668 and P685 would comply with the MLP.…”
Section: Tph Determination Methods and Sara Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it is suggested to consider evaluating oil spills in soils, the SARA fractions and the date of the spill. On the one hand, the results show that the type of solvent defines the amount of isolated analyte, which varies its solubility (González-Mille et al, 2019); and on the other hand, although the samples are located within the same study area, the differences between the SARA fractions and the FTIR show that the time and conditions of the spill could influence the transformation of the hydrocarbon (Xu et al, 2019;Xing et al, 2019). An example of the above is that according to the values in Table I, with TPHP the samples P631, P655, P659, P668, P685, P688 and P702 do not exceed the Maximum Permissible Limit (MLP) of TPH established for agricultural use in Mexico (4400 mg kg −1 ), whereas with TPHS values, only P655, P659, P668 and P685 would comply with the MLP.…”
Section: Tph Determination Methods and Sara Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to these low concentrations, some of these sites have been declared below the permissible limits, but in some cases, environmental problems persist affecting the growth and development of plants (Sánchez et al, 2017;Challenger et al, 2018). Hence, Soto et al (2018) and González-Mille et al (2019) highlight the importance of considering methods of identification of these components since they relate them to negative effects on water potential, density, and porosity of the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, pollution is currently considered one of the most serious threats to biological diversity. Exposure and effect biomarkers can be examined and integrated simultaneously to provide more information about probable toxicity pathways and ecosystem component health [16].…”
Section: Effect Of Pops On Wildlifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Products containing BPA are widely used, and, thus, we can find it in the environment: in the air, soil, natural surface waters and sediments, underground water in landfills, and in wastewater [2]. BPA has the potential to disturb wildlife health and human health [3][4][5][6]. It can influence enzymatic, androgenic, neurological, liver, and reproductive systems at different stages of human life, such as in foetal, child and adult stages [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%