2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do industries lead stock markets?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
375
12
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 605 publications
(426 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
37
375
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ewing (2002) examines five major S&P indices and concludes that shocks to an index can account for much of the fluctuation in other indices. Hong et al (2007) find that the returns of a significant number of US industry portfolios can be used to forecast the movements of the stock market and, furthermore, similar results are obtained for other non-US markets. Kong et al (2009) find that different industry portfolios present different predictability when considering a variety of economic variables and lagged industry returns as predictors.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Ewing (2002) examines five major S&P indices and concludes that shocks to an index can account for much of the fluctuation in other indices. Hong et al (2007) find that the returns of a significant number of US industry portfolios can be used to forecast the movements of the stock market and, furthermore, similar results are obtained for other non-US markets. Kong et al (2009) find that different industry portfolios present different predictability when considering a variety of economic variables and lagged industry returns as predictors.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Rockinger [7]; Boldrin et al [8]; Estrella et al [9]; Vassalou [10]; Duarte et al [11]; Hong et al [12]; Clements and Galvao [13]; Cooper and Priestley [14]; Marcellino and Schumacher [15], amongst others). Theoretically, changes in industrial production lead to changes in activity, employment and liquidity in the economy.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 clearly shows that the optimal level of attention is decreasing with the value of EIS for different values of the marginal information-processing cost. 26 That is, when consumers are more reluctant in substituting their consumption over time (low EIS), they choose to devote more capacity and attention to monitoring the evolution of the state. The intuition behind this result is that when inattentive consumers really like flat consumption profile, they devote more attention to monitoring the state in order to avoid making the consumption profile steep, which occurs with low attention due to "accidental savings".…”
Section: Elastic Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%