2018
DOI: 10.1111/mila.12183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do non‐verbal number systems shape grammar? Numerical cognition and Number morphology compared

Abstract: Number morphology (e.g., singular vs. plural) is a part of the grammar that captures numerical information. Some languages have morphological Number values, which express few (paucal), two (dual), three (trial) and sometimes (possibly) four (quadral). Interestingly, the limit of the attested morphological Number values matches the limit of non‐verbal numerical cognition. The latter is based on two systems, one estimating approximate numerosities and the other computing exact numerosities up to three or four. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a morpheme is used as a default, it is, in principle, not interpretable at the semantic level. Number morphology is not an exception in this regard: the singular is generally the default value for uncountable references (whereas other Number values are more likely to be semantically interpretable; Franzon, Zanini & Rugani 2018;Arcara et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When a morpheme is used as a default, it is, in principle, not interpretable at the semantic level. Number morphology is not an exception in this regard: the singular is generally the default value for uncountable references (whereas other Number values are more likely to be semantically interpretable; Franzon, Zanini & Rugani 2018;Arcara et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a link has been outlined between this information and information encoded in morphology and morpho-syntax, suggesting that information processed by these systems would be sufficiently salient to have shaped the grammatical structure of language. In other words, information encoded in a core linguistic level, such as morphology, would stem from information coming from core knowledge processes (Bickel et al 2015;Franzon, Zanini & Rugani 2018;Strickland 2017;Zanini et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eventually, Franzon et al (2019Franzon et al ( , 2020 argued that nonverbal numerical cognition also shapes grammatical number. The authors provided typological and neuropsychological evidence in favor of the hypothesis that the possible range of inflectional number values (as reflected, for example, in the inflection of nouns such as in apple vs. apples) parallels the numerosities processed by the non-verbal numerical core knowledge systems.…”
Section: The Signature Of Numerical Cognition In Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resonates with general typological trends whereby the feature of number is prioritized over the feature of gender. Indeed, grammatical gender is less widespread across languages (Corbett, 1991) and, as stated in Greenberg's Universal 34, in a language, the presence of number is a necessary condition for gender to surface (Greenberg, 1963) possibly, due to a preminence of the semantic information conveyed by number (Franzon et al, 2019(Franzon et al, , 2020. Thus, noun forms are less informative with respect to gender (and, to a lesser extent, number) since their main role is to distinguish classes of words mainly favoring discriminability between diverse forms as a whole rather than between gender and number values.…”
Section: Form-value Transparency In Nouns and Adjectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%