Do socioeconomic determinants affect the quality of posterior dental restorations? A multilevel approach

Corrêa, Marcos Britto; Peres, Marco Aurélio; Peres, Karen Glazer; Horta, Bernardo Lessa; Barros, Aluísio J D; Demarco, Flávio Fernando

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.02.010

Cited by 64 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although still under investigation on survival analysis of restorations, socioeconomic status of patients has been shown to affect the longevity of restorations, 30 probably motivated by the effect of socioeconomic determinants on dental caries. One of the few studies that investigated this association has shown, in a birth cohort study, that an unfavorable socioeconomic trajectory during life course is associated to a higher presence of subsequent unsatisfactory restorations.…”

Section: Socioeconomic Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the few studies that investigated this association has shown, in a birth cohort study, that an unfavorable socioeconomic trajectory during life course is associated to a higher presence of subsequent unsatisfactory restorations. 30 Authors concluded that people who had always lived in the poorest stratus of population had more restoration failures than those who lived in the richest layer. Similar results were observed for posterior restorations placed in a Dutch practice based research.…”

Section: Socioeconomic Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Composites resins have become the first choice for direct anterior and posterior restorations. The great popularity is related to their esthetic appearance and reduced need of sound tissue removal as compared with former treatments. Several studies have demonstrated that composite restorations may last long in clinical service. In this review we discuss the factors playing a role on the long-term longevity. Composite restorations have demonstrated a good clinical performance with annual failure rates varying from 1% to 3% in posterior teeth and 1% to 5% in anterior teeth. Factors related to the patients such as caries risk and occlusal stress risk, in addition to socioeconomic factors, may affect the survival significantly. Characteristics of the clinical operators, particularly their decision making when it comes to observing or approaching an existing restoration, are decisive for longevity. Cavity features such as the number of restored walls, composite volume, and presence of endodontic treatment are of major importance and may dictate the service time of the restorative approach. The choice of restorative composite seems to have a minor effect on longevity provided that appropriate technical procedures are used. The main reasons for failure in posterior teeth are secondary caries and fracture (restoration or tooth/restoration), while in anterior teeth esthetic concerns are the main reasons leading to restoration failures. Composite resin restorations can be considered a reliable treatment as long as both the professional and the patient are aware of the factors involved in restoration failures.

show abstract

Section: Socioeconomic Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Socioeconomic Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, Correa et al 25 found that adolescents of 15 years of age with more than 5 decayed teeth had a higher risk of failed restorations. Our results may be explained by the increase in parental care in children with higher caries experience after the start of treatment.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Good survival rates for single-surface Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations have been reported, while multi-surface ART restorations have not shown similar results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival rate of occluso-proximal ART restorations using two different filling materials: Ketac Molar EasyMix (3M ESPE) and Vitro Molar (DFL). A total of 117 primary molars with occluso-proximal caries lesions were selected in 4 to 8 years old children in Barueri city, Brazil. Only one tooth was selected per child. The subjetcs were randomly allocated in two groups according to the filling material. All treatments were performed following the ART premises and all restorations were evaluated after 2, 6 and 12 months. Restoration survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-rank test, while Cox regression analysis was used for testing association with clinical factors (α = 5%). There was no difference in survival rate between the materials tested, (HR = 1.60, CI = 0.98-2.62, p = 0.058). The overall survival rate of restorations was 42.74% and the survival rate per group was Ketac Molar = 50,8% and Vitro Molar G2 = 34.5%). Cox regression test showed no association between the analyzed clinical variables and the success of the restorations. After 12 months evaluation, no difference in the survival rate of ART occluso-proximal restorations was found between tested materials.

show abstract

“…Diferentes fatores, como as características do paciente e do dente, o tamanho da cavidade, o operador e o material, influenciam na longevidade das restaurações (1,4) e as principais razões para as falhas são atribuídas a recidivas de cáries, fraturas do material restaurador e fatores relacionados ao paciente e sua característica socioeconômica (2,5).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Efeito da radioterapia com raios x de alta energia sobre a resistência de união da dentina humana com resina composta – estudo in vitro

Brandeburski¹,

Reichert²

2018

JOI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo experimental é avaliar o efeito da radiação com raios X de alta energia na resistência de união entre dentina humana e resina composta. Métodos: Trinta terceiros molares humanos hígidos foram seccionados, produzindo superfícies oclusais planas de dentina, e distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos (n=15): um não irradiado e restaurado com Resina Composta Filtek Z-250, 3M-ESPE® (G1, n=15 – grupo controle), outro irradiado e restaurado com Resina Composta Filtek Z-250, 3M-ESPE® (G2, n=15). O protocolo de radiação utilizado foi de 70 Gy no total. As amostras foram cortadas em palitos (área média de 1 mm2) e submetidas ao teste de microtração. Os dados foram comparados por meio do teste t-student (p <0,05). O padrão de fratura foi examinado em microscopia óptica e submetido ao teste exato de Fischer (p <0,05). Resultados: não houve diferença significativa entre o grupo de dentes não irradiados e irradiados (p=0,738). O grupo controle e o grupo irradiado apresentaram predominância no padrão de fratura de falhas coesivas em resina e/ou mistas e falhas adesivas foram verificadas somente no grupo dos dentes irradiados. Conclusões: A radiação não interfere significativamente na resistência de união da dentina humana restaurada com resina composta e que não houve influência significativa entre os grupos estudados em relação ao padrão de fratura.

show abstract

Do socioeconomic determinants affect the quality of posterior dental restorations? A multilevel approach

Abstract: Individual socioeconomic characteristics were associated with failure in posterior restorations in detriment of other clinical variables such as restorative material and type of tooth.

Cited by 64 publications

References 31 publications

Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?

Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?

One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT

Efeito da radioterapia com raios x de alta energia sobre a resistência de união da dentina humana com resina composta – estudo in vitro

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About