2014
DOI: 10.5507/bp.2012.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do we always consistently define the clinically important echocardiographic parameters?

Abstract: Aims. The aim of this short communication is to highlight some inconsistencies in defining two clinically important echocardiographic parameters with possible impact on clinical practice. Methods and Results. A surview of publications in reputable cardiological journals revealed inconsistencies posing questions on the validity of the published data and on the scrupulousness of the reviewing process. We demonstrate examples of inconsistencies in the calculation of left ventricular mass using Devereux's formula … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 13 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?