Do we need more economics in Australian economic diplomacy?

Sainsbury, Tristram

doi:10.1080/10357718.2016.1220491

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While there is no common definition, there have been a few attempts to develop definitions and analytical frameworks (Okano‐Heijmans, 2013, pp. 1–3; Sainsbury, 2016, p. 614). This article adopts Moons and Bergeijk's definition, which states that economic diplomacy is a set of activities in the processes and methods for decision‐making internationally centers around economic activities across borders, including import, export, migration, lending, investment, and aid carried out by states and nonstate actors globally (Moons & van Bergeijk, 2017, p. 1).…”

Section: Economic Diplomacymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Economic diplomacy explains a state's interactions with other actors and is a tool of foreign policy toward a geographic area or issue. In this vein, studies on states' economic diplomacy include South Africa (Qobo, 2010), China (Chaziza, 2019; Sun & Zoubir, 2015), Australia (Sainsbury, 2016), France (Badel, 2014), Japan (Okano‐Heijmans, 2012), Saudi Arabia (Li, 2019), India (Dabhade, 2022), and Croatia (Peternel & Grešš, 2021). Economic diplomacy has also been applied to interactions between two or more states and international organizations, or multilateral economic diplomacy (Lee, 2001).…”

Section: Economic Diplomacymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nonstate actors include business firms, interest groups, nongovernmental organizations, and civil societies, which try to shape governments' policies. Economic diplomacy has been viewed as either a tool of a country's foreign policy or a partial vision for bolstering a state's commercial and broader economic interests (Qobo, 2010; Sainsbury, 2016, pp. 613–624).…”

Section: Economic Diplomacymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Bilateral economic diplomacy between South Korea and Iraq

Gul

2024

Asian Politics and Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article discusses the evolution of Iraq‐South Korea relations since the late 1970s. It relies on Iraq's and South Korea's governmental platforms, local media outlets, and databases such as the Korea Statistical Information Service and the Observatory of Economic Complexity. This article argues that while in the 1970s both countries had economic rapport, bilateral economic diplomacy between both countries began in the 1980s, faced challenges in the 1990s and was revived by 2003. In the 1970s, the relationship was focused on trade and infrastructure. By the 1980s, official diplomatic and bilateral relations took shape, resulting in increased trade and South Korea energy ventures in Iraq. By the 1990s relations were dormant due to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and the UN sanctions. In 2003, the diplomatic relationship was revived and further enhanced. These include energy, trade, infrastructure, and South Korea's humanitarian, military, and industrial assistance to Iraq. The post‐2003 phase shows the expansion of ties between both countries including the Kurdistan Regional Government. Bilateral economic diplomacy between South Korea and Iraq has not been without political and security challenges, particularly concerning Iraq's political stability.

show abstract

Section: Economic Diplomacymentioning

confidence: 99%