2021
DOI: 10.1257/aeri.20200466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Women Respond Less to Performance Pay? Building Evidence from Multiple Experiments

Abstract: Existing empirical work raises the hypothesis that performance pay—whatever its output gains—may widen the gender earnings gap because women may respond less to incentives. We evaluate this possibility by aggregating evidence from existing experiments on performance incentives with male and female subjects. Using a Bayesian hierarchical model, we estimate both the average effect and heterogeneity across studies. We find that the gender response difference is close to zero and heterogeneity across studies is sm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
8
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus even respondents who believe that men and women are fairly similar on other traits—a belief in line with the meta‐analyses of Bandiera et al . (2021) and Rao (2020)—believe that they differ in overconfidence. The next section will show how findings from the experimental literature compare to economists’ beliefs about gender differences in overconfidence.…”
Section: Experts’ Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus even respondents who believe that men and women are fairly similar on other traits—a belief in line with the meta‐analyses of Bandiera et al . (2021) and Rao (2020)—believe that they differ in overconfidence. The next section will show how findings from the experimental literature compare to economists’ beliefs about gender differences in overconfidence.…”
Section: Experts’ Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with the findings of BHM estimates of gender gaps in altruism (Rao 2020) and response to incentives (Bandiera et al . 2021). In contrast to these studies, however, the pooling factor is low and the relatively large posterior variance implies that each individual study is poorly informative about a common phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analysis for research synthesis has been actively studied in statistics and the resulting literature is vast; see, e.g., Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, and Rothstein (2009) for a textbook and Cooper et al (2019) for a handbook volume. In economics, existing applications of meta-analysis and meta-regression include Card and Krueger (1995), Dehejia (2003), Bandiera, Fischer, Prat, and Ytsma (2017), Card et al (2017), Meager (2019Meager ( , 2020, Imai, Rutter, andCamerer (2020), andVivalt (2020). See Stanley (2001) for a review.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential usefulness of this approach is particularly marked in the area of programme evaluation, where causal programme effects often suffer from limited external validity (Olsen et al, 2013;Alcott, 2015;Athey and Imbens, 2017). MRA can help generalise beyond "local" inferences (Bandiera et al, 2016;Vivalt, 2020) and understand to which extent, and in which situations, enterprise and innovation policies are effective according to the estimates reported in counterfactual evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%