Document Network and Conceptual and Social Structures of Clinical Endoscopy from 2015 to July 2021 Based on the Web of Science Core Collection: A Bibliometric Study

Abstract

Background/Aims: The present study investigated the relevance and network of institutions, keywords, and authors’ countries of the articles in Clinical Endoscopy published from 2015 to May 2021 based on the Web of Science Core Collection.Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection was searched with the term Clinical Endoscopy as the publication title on July 12, 2021. All 776 citations published from 2015 to May 2021 and 2,964 articles citing those 776 articles were analyzed using Biblioshiny.Results: The corresponding authors were from 73 countries. Document coupling showed that the colorectal cancer-colonoscopyrandomized controlled trial cluster had the most significant impact and highest centrality. There were 442 articles with corresponding authors from Korea (57.0%). The number of collaborative works by Korean authors with the authors of other countries was 33 (7.5%). The articles were cited 2,964 times by corresponding authors from 37 countries.Conclusions: The above results show that Clinical Endoscopy has published several studies on gastrointestinal endoscopy. A large proportion of citations (84.7 %) were from outside Korea, indicating that the journal content is useful for global physicians. Collaborative work between authors from Korea and other countries should be encouraged to promote the journal.

Promotion to Top-Tier Journal and Development Strategy of the Annals of Laboratory Medicine for Strengthening its Leadership in the Medical Laboratory Technology Category: A Bibliometric Study

“…In Clinical Endoscopy , the “colorectal cancer-colonoscopy-randomized controlled trial” cluster showed the highest impact and centrality by document coupling. Collaborative works by Korean authors with authors of other countries (7.5%) were also found [ 11 ]. The h-index of Blood Research in 2016 was 10 based on the Web of Science Core Collection [ 12 ].…”

Journal metrics, document network, and conceptual and social structures of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology from 2017 to July 2022: a bibliometric study

“…In Clinical Endoscopy , the ‘colorectal cancer-colonoscopy-randomized controlled trial’ cluster had the most important influence and the highest centrality. Most of the citations (84.7%) were from outside Korea, indicating that the journal’s content is helpful to physicians worldwide [ 4 ]. In Annals of Laboratory Medicine , the Keywords Plus co-occurrence network identified four clusters: diagnosis, identification, prevalence, and risk.…”

“…This journal has been an important medium that introduces the achievements of anesthesiologists of Korea internationally. It is time to present a leadership reinforcement strategy based on bibliometric analysis, as has been done for other medical journals in Korea, including Ultrasonography [ 3 ], Clinical Endoscopy [ 4 ], and Annals of Laboratory Medicine [ 5 ]. A bibliometric analysis also clarifies the evolution of specific research fields [ 6 , 7 ].…”

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Mobile Learning Adoption and Continuance in the Field of Education

“…Subsequently, multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was performed to create a two-dimensional conceptual map of Keyword Plus terms. It was used for dimensionality reduction to identify underlying structures in the dataset [49]. K-means clustering was used to identify keywords that express common concepts [50].…”