2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does a dual attending surgeon strategy confer additional benefit for posterior selective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)? A prospective propensity matching score analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our research, the blood transfusion rate in cases with idiopathic scoliosis was 17.2% (64/372). Our findings were almost the same except for two surgical strategies, which might lead to a faster surgery, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and a reduced risk of ABT [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In our research, the blood transfusion rate in cases with idiopathic scoliosis was 17.2% (64/372). Our findings were almost the same except for two surgical strategies, which might lead to a faster surgery, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and a reduced risk of ABT [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…[ 14 ] These results were mirrored in subgroups of patients with Lenke 1 and 2 curves. [ 15 , 16 ] Similarly, Abousamra et al found decreased operative time and blood loss in spine surgery performed by 2 attending surgeons as compared with a single surgeon in patients with CP. [ 13 ] Our study also demonstrated decreased operative time with 2 attending surgeons in SEMLS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study was done by Kwan MK et al to compare surgery outcomes between a single versus a dual attending surgeon strategy. Their result showed that those who were operated by two surgeons had shorter operating time 164 min (257.3 min with a single surgeon), less blood loss 893.7 ml (1254.7 ml with a single surgeon) and shorter length of stay 3.4 days [14] . Compared to our data, the blood loss in our study is minimal with a very comparable single surgeon operative time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%