Does agricultural extension promote technology adoption in Sri Lanka

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the effect of agricultural extension services provided by public sector on the individual technology adoption behaviour of rice farmers in Sri Lanka. Design/methodology/approach The study used data from a cross sectional survey conducted in seven rice procuring regions in Sri Lanka. Eight rice technologies were selected to explore the effect of extension service on adoption behaviour of rice farmers using probit models. The extension service variable was identified as potentially endogeneous and instrumented using average extension for each region. Findings The results revealed that the extension service variable was positive and indicative of a high level of significance in all the rice technologies promoting the adoption. Hence the public agricultural extension service programmes were considered as significant explanators of technology adoption. The farmers who received agricultural extension service were more likely to adopt a technology. Social implications At present, the position of agricultural extension service is questioned and the future is unknown. Therefore, this study advises policy makers to prioritise agricultural policies to strengthen public spending on agricultural extension for effective adoption of technological innovations. Originality/value The paper adds solid empirical evidence to the literature on technology adoption behaviour from a peasant agricultural context in a developing country scenario that uses farm level data. Moreover, the study contributes to the literature by reiterating the significance of public provision of extension and training programmes as a direct motive in the technology adoption behaviour of farmers.

Predicting Sustainable Farm Performance—Using Hybrid Structural Equation Modelling with an Artificial Neural Network Approach

“…Likewise, Ma and Abdulai [1] reported a positive and significant effect of education on the intention to adopt climate-friendly farming practices among the small landholder farmers from China. Walisinghe et al [33] reported an insignificant and negative effect of farmers' education on the intention to use CAPs. Moreover, Tey et al [22] revealed a negative effect of education on the intention to adopt CAPs.…”

“…Farming is about engaging with the environment. Farmers follow and read about weather patterns to get involved in farming practices [33]. The concern for the environment is natural for farmers.…”

“…Wossen et al [47] found that the extension services among Ethiopian farmers had positively influenced the intention to adopt CAPs. Meanwhile, Walisinghe et al [33] reported that the extension services received by farmers had a positive impact on the adoption of CAPs.…”

Nexus between Awareness, Perception and Adoption of Recommended Technologies: Evidences from Smallholder Rubber Cultivation

“…Comparable results have been reported in Sri Lanka on rice cultivation. Walisinghe et al (2017) reported that public agricultural extension service programs were found to be significant explanatory variables of technology adoption in their study. However, extension visits in the past three months have become non-significant.…”

Adoption of New Sorghum Varieties in Mali Through a Participatory Approach

“…Farmers' interactions in their community or tribe can be more important sources of information and more efficient than extension services, as observed for the case of manioc adoption in Nigeria [38]. Still, in addition to numerous studies undertaken during the green revolution, recent research recognizes the crucial role of extension services in the adoption of new technologies [39,40]. Concerning gender differentiation, Thériault et al [41] showed that technology adoption decisions are influenced differently following the gender of plot managers, as male managers have greater access to extension services, in comparison with female managers.…”