Does AI make PD obsolete?

Bratteteig, Tone; Verne, Guri

doi:10.1145/3210604.3210646

Cited by 46 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interestingly, whilst HCI borrows heavily (if to varying levels of credit) from PD, PD is criticised from amongst its own community for its "ambivalence" [8] in failing to promote wider take up and use of its own tools and techniques, elsewhere. This is particularly telling in areas such as TIPS with dichotomous and often competing aims and objectives (compare with [9]). From the vast number of practical toolkits available for general use we selected two for inclusion in our sample.…”

Section: Review Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Storytelling and Reflective Annotation Annotation/notes [43] [5] [22] [11]; costume annotation [9]; day in the life exercises [7]; diaries/diary-study [7]; storytelling [17] [27] -timelines [28]; washing line scale [20]; creating story sheet/ storyboarding [11] [22] [21] [35]; fictional narrative [7]; narrative scenario [27]; persona cards [27]; newspaper story [9]; picture book [18]; speculative scenarios [12]; personal narratives [22]; fantasy persona [28]; current experience comic strip (CECS) [25] digital storytelling [22]; envisioning exercise [9]; privacy awareness interventions [10]; think-out-loud technology evaluations [10].…”

Section: Materials Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Improvisation, Performance and Role Play roleplay [9]; participatory theatre [10]; participatory envisioning and enactment [37]; improvised scenarios [7]; performance-derived improvisation methods [28]; props [4] [12] [28] [37].…”

Section: Visual and 3d Modellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Games and Cards card trading game [10]; concept cards [43]; board game [9]; show and tell family workshops [10]; questionable concept cards [43] [17]; resource cards [32]; family design game [6]; prompt [32]; prompted exploration [31]; enactment game with technological artifacts (acting-out security) [31].…”

Section: Visual and 3d Modellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Landscaping, Problem Setting and Mapping collage [7] [10] [17] [35] [37] [43] [11]; brainstorming [31] [11]; creative security engagements [35] [17]; probe [28]; Digital probe [10] Cultural probe [7] [10] [37] [38] [31] [22] [17]; exploratory interview [27]; information gathering kit [22]; boundary object [6]; cake assemblage [9]; tea party [43]; holistic mapping exercise [9]; participatory mapping [22]; mapping [37]; cognitive mapping [7].…”

Section: Visual and 3d Modellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Creative Toolkits for TIPS

Collard

Briggs

2020

Computer Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present a survey of toolkits employed in research workshop approaches within TIPS (Trust, Identity, Privacy and Security) domains. Our survey was developed within wider design research to develop prototypes that support people in evaluating whether to trust that an online actor's identity is not recently faked, and that a service they are registering personal information with is legitimate; and a subsequent project involving a tool that invites people to reflect on the cumulative risks of sharing apparently harmless personal information online. The radically multidisciplinary nature of both these TIPS projects has determined that we create a research space to promote exchange to, as design researchers, better understand the 'opaque' immediate and longer term implications of our proposed services and invite cross-disciplinary discussion towards interdisciplinary understandings. This paper is intended as an at-a-glance resource, or indeed toolkit, for researchers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds working on TIPS research to inform on various different material engagements, with research stakeholders, through creative workshop approaches. Our survey focused on the literature from Design (especially Participatory Design and Codesign), Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and cybersecurity. It comprises 27 papers or toolkit examples organised across: review papers; example toolkits; case studies reporting relevant toolkit use; applied toolkits for learning/knowledge exchange; research toolkits focused on demonstrating a methodological-conceptual approach (some problematising emergent or near-future technologies); and two papers that straddled the latter two categories, focusing on future practical application. We begin with an overview of our rationale and method before presenting each group of texts in a table alongside a summary discussion. We go on to discuss the various material components, affordances and terminology of the toolkits along with core concerns often left out of the reporting of research; before going on to recognise toolkits not so much as things that diagnose and fix things, but as a loose collection of readily available material and wider resources, used in particular participatory approaches, which together help account for techno-relational differences and contingencies in TIPS-related fields.

show abstract

Section: Review Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%