Does bruxism impact the quality of life of children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bezerra, Isis Morais; Brito, Arella Cristina Muniz; Martins, Mariana Leonel; Sousa, Simone Alves de; Serpa, Eliane Batista de Medeiros; Santiago, Bianca Marques; Almeida, Leopoldina de Fátima Dantas de; Cavalcanti, Yuri Wanderley

doi:10.1007/s10389-019-01151-8

Cited by 2 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, different quality assessment methods were used. The most cited method was the PRISMA [ 9 , 27 – 29 , 31 – 33 , 35 – 44 ]. However, seven systematic reviews showed no risk of bias in the analyzed studies [ 9 , 26 , 30 , 36 , 43 – 45 ] and 10 studies did not perform meta-analysis [ 9 , 26 , 27 , 30 , 36 , 38 , 41 , 43 – 45 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The methodological quality of the systematic reviews included (Table 1 ), based on the criteria proposed by AMSTAR 2, considered 10 articles of critically low quality [ 9 , 27 – 30 , 34 , 36 , 40 , 45 ], 10 articles of low quality [ 29 , 31 , 33 , 36 – 38 , 41 – 44 , 46 ], one systematic review of moderate quality [ 39 ], and one of moderate/high quality [ 34 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… - 16. Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review - - - + - - - - Review quality Critically Low Low quality Critically Low Low quality Low quality Low quality Moderate Critically Low AMSTAR 2 question lists Alrashed et al, 2020 [ 40 ] Zhou1 et al, 2014 [ 28 ] Silva Rodrigues et al, 2018 [ 45 ] Mandava et al, 2021 [ 41 ] Yactayo-Alburquerque et al, 2021 [ 9 ] Milani et al, 2021 [ 46 ] Bezerra et al, 2019 [ 33 ] Kumar et al, 2014 [ 42 ] 1.Did the research questions and inclusion criteria for the review include PICO components? + + + + - + + - 2.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review

Chimbinha,

Ferreira,

Miranda

et al. 2023

BMC Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To evaluate oral conditions, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in adolescents. Methods Umbrella review, conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyzes (PRISMA) checklist. The search strategy used a combination of words, applied in the electronic databases PubMed, WebScience, Embase, Lilacs, Scopus and Cochrane. Included publications until January 2022, without restrictions. Data collection took place with systematized practices and the eligibility criteria were studies focusing on OHRQoL; teenagers; adolescentes; present the term “systematic review” and/or “meta-analysis” in the title or abstract. The quality assessment followed the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2) and the adherence of the article to the PRISMA was verified. Results Three hundred sixty-two articles were identified, and 22 were included, published between 2009 and 2022. 21 Systematic reviews focused on the English language. Most studies showed heterogeneity in the methodological structuring process: 10 articles were considered of low and 10 critically low quality. Clinical conditions associated with worsening in quality of life were dental caries, malocclusion, dental trauma, toothache, edentulism, need for orthodontic treatment, irregular brushing, and periodontal disease. Socioeconomic factors related to housing, parental education, access to health care, absence of siblings and nuclear family influence OHRQoL. Completion of orthodontic treatment, health promotion programs, dental care and safe housing all have a positive impact. Conclusion Worse oral health status, older age, female sex and worse socioeconomic status were significantly associated with worse OHRQoL. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD4202129352.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review

Chimbinha,

Ferreira,

Miranda

et al. 2023

BMC Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It was observed that only one article was considered of moderate/high quality [45] and one article of moderate Quality [33], ten had critically low Quality [9, 27, 29, 32-36, 42, 44, 46], and ten others had low quality [28, [30][31][32][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], according to the AMSTAR 2-based method. This made it di cult to carry out the meta-analysis of this systematic review.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The methodological quality of the systematic reviews included (Table 1), based on the criteria proposed by AMSTAR 2, considered 10 articles of critically low quality [9,27,30,[34][35][36]42,[44][45], 10 articles of low quality[28, [30][31][32][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], one systematic review of moderate quality [33], and one of moderate/high quality [45].…”

Section: Characteristics and Methodological Quality Of Eligible Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents: Umbrella Review

Chimbinha

Ferreira

Miranda

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To evaluate oral conditions, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of oral health-related quality of life in adolescents. Methods: umbrella review, conducted according to the PRISMA checklist. The search strategy used a combination of words, applied in the electronic databases PubMed, WebScience, Embase, Lilacs, Scopus and Cochrane. Included publications until January 2022, without restrictions. Data collection took place with systematized practices and the eligibility criteria were studies focusing on quality of life related to oral health; teenagers; present the term “systematic review” and/or “meta-analysis” in the title or abstract. The quality assessment used the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR2) and the adherence of the article to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyzes (PRISMA) was verified. Results: 361 articles identified. 21 included. Systematic reviews focus on the English language, between 2009 and 2022 they showed heterogeneity in the methodological structuring process and were considered of low or critically low quality. Clinical conditions associated with worsening in quality of life were dental caries, malocclusion, dental trauma, toothache, edentulism, need for orthodontic treatment, irregular brushing and periodontal disease. Socioeconomic factors related to housing, parental education, access to health care, absence of siblings and nuclear family influence HRQoL. Completion of orthodontic treatment, health promotion programs, dental care and safe housing all have a positive impact. Conclusion: Worse oral health status, older age, female sex and worse socioeconomic status were significantly associated with worse HRQoL.Registration :PROSPERO CRD4202129352

show abstract

Does bruxism impact the quality of life of children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cited by 2 publications

References 17 publications

Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review

Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review

Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents: Umbrella Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About