2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown similar types of contextual bias in document examination (Miller, 1984), bite mark analysis (Osborne et al, 2014), bloodstain pattern analysis (Taylor et al, 2014); forensic anthropology (Nakhaeizadeh et al, 2013); and DNA analysis (Dror and Hampikian, 2011;Thompson, 2009). Studies have shown similar types of contextual bias in document examination (Miller, 1984), bite mark analysis (Osborne et al, 2014), bloodstain pattern analysis (Taylor et al, 2014); forensic anthropology (Nakhaeizadeh et al, 2013); and DNA analysis (Dror and Hampikian, 2011;Thompson, 2009).…”
Section: Forensic Sciencementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Studies have shown similar types of contextual bias in document examination (Miller, 1984), bite mark analysis (Osborne et al, 2014), bloodstain pattern analysis (Taylor et al, 2014); forensic anthropology (Nakhaeizadeh et al, 2013); and DNA analysis (Dror and Hampikian, 2011;Thompson, 2009). Studies have shown similar types of contextual bias in document examination (Miller, 1984), bite mark analysis (Osborne et al, 2014), bloodstain pattern analysis (Taylor et al, 2014); forensic anthropology (Nakhaeizadeh et al, 2013); and DNA analysis (Dror and Hampikian, 2011;Thompson, 2009).…”
Section: Forensic Sciencementioning
confidence: 95%
“…When considering the reliability of any forensic method, it is important to assess whether factors outside of the evidence can influence the reliability of interpretations. In particular, a growing body of research has demonstrated that expert interpretations may be influenced by the presentation of contextual information (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am concerned, however, about the authors' presentation of some of the literature relating to bias in forensic science. In particular, the authors have cited several studies conducted by myself and my colleagues' (2)(3)(4)(5)(6), but have either misinterpreted our findings, or have misused the citations to support their point. The statements in question are in the following paragraph (p. 3):…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Research examining blinding approaches is still rather novel: in our review of the literature, we found relatively few studies, apart from Dror's, that have tested similar blinding procedures. These studies demonstrated mixed results [ (2)(3)(4)].…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 99%