2014
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbu071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Embeddedness Protect? Personal Network Density and Vulnerability to Mistreatment Among Older American Adults

Abstract: Results highlight how network-level phenomena can operate distinctively from dyadic mistreatment processes. Dense personal networks seem to provide structural protection against elder mistreatment, even as many offensive acts are committed by those that are close to the victim and relatively well embedded in their network.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for this possibility, I follow the inverse probability weighting adjustment used in other NSHAP studies to correct for non-random attrition between waves and potential selection bias (e.g., Cornwell and Laumann 2015; Schafer and Koltai 2015; York Cornwell and Waite 2012). I first use a logit model to predict whether a baseline respondent is included in the final analytic sample, using a number of sociodemographic, health, and network-related covariates (including total network size and total kin network members (0–7)) as predictors.…”
Section: Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To account for this possibility, I follow the inverse probability weighting adjustment used in other NSHAP studies to correct for non-random attrition between waves and potential selection bias (e.g., Cornwell and Laumann 2015; Schafer and Koltai 2015; York Cornwell and Waite 2012). I first use a logit model to predict whether a baseline respondent is included in the final analytic sample, using a number of sociodemographic, health, and network-related covariates (including total network size and total kin network members (0–7)) as predictors.…”
Section: Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain social resources that benefit individual health may depend on there being social closure among one's closest network members (Coleman 1988). For instance, older adults who bridge members of their social networks are more likely to experience abuse or mistreatment than those with more social closure among network alters (Schafer and Koltai 2015). In this circumstance, a bridging position may compromise alters' capacity to share information and coordinate protection ego against stressful or harmful events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data suggest approximately 1 in 20 adults can be expected to experience some form of financial exploitation past the age of 60, an incidence rate eclipsing many age-related diseases. These are almost certainly underestimates of the true prevalence as many older adults are unaware or unwilling to report exploitation ( 3 , 4 ). This latter point highlights the difficulty in conducting research in this area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural formation also influences how easily the depressed individual can solicit help from her friends and family. If the network members all know each other (i.e., bonding social capital), they can coordinate their efforts to provide a system of support (Schafer and Koltai 2014). Conversely, if the network members do not know each other (i.e., bridging social capital), there is a greater chance that they will be privy to non‐redundant information and perspectives that may also be used to the depressed individual’s advantage (Burt 1992, Goldman and Cornwell 2015).…”
Section: What Do We Know About Network and Health?mentioning
confidence: 99%