Does group size and blending matter? Impact of a digital mental health game implemented with refugees in various settings

Abstract

Purpose There is an urgent need to upscale accessible mental health (MH) interventions that address barriers to care among Syrian refugee adolescents. The Happy Helping Hand (HH) is an innovative, cognitive behavioral digital game designed to improve MH for adolescents across digital divides. This study aims to examine the impact of HH implemented among Syrian refugees who varied according to group size and face-to-face (F2F) versus digital contact. Design/methodology/approach This mixed-methods study took place in Central Beqaa, Lebanon, from September 2020 to February 2021. Nine groups of Syrian displaced adolescents (n = 125) aged 13–17 years (Mage = 13.6 years) were recruited from an education center, two orphanages and one informal settlement to participate in the ten-session HH program. The WHO-Five-Well-being Index (WHO5) is a validated measure used to evaluate HH impact on MH at baseline and directly postintervention. Findings Significant improvements were seen in WHO5 scores in F2F and digital settings from baseline to follow-up. At baseline, 28% reported normal well-being, which increased to 99% after HH participation. WHO5 scores changed from M = 59.4 at baseline, indicating depression, to M = 77.3 at follow-up, indicating normal well-being. Smaller groups with more F2F contact reported greater improvements in mean WHO5 than larger groups with less F2F contact. The greatest aggregate change in well-being was achieved when HH was implemented digitally in bigger groups. Originality/value Study results indicate that the HH game can improve well-being and MH for Syrian refugees. Importantly, results build on the base of evidence on digital MH interventions as promising tools on the way to ensure healthy lives and well-being for all.

From childhood obesity risk to healthy growth in the U.S.: A 10-year social work research & policy update

“…New metrics are needed to measure reductions in health disparities as outcomes, rather than individual behavior metrics. For example, validated and reliable measures are needed that address proximal and distal factors that impact health-promoting behaviors, improvements in wellbeing, and feedback loops between mental and physical health outcomes ( Schuler and DeForge, 2015 , Schuler, 2015 , Schuler and Raknes, 2022 ).…”